Skill detail

sales-account-segmentation

Designs the account segmentation model between ICP and tiering: signal layers, weighted fit score calibrated from closed-won deals, whitespace mapping, and CRM encoding.

MatchDirectRecommended for Sales
Sourcembfinotti/​sales-skillsExternal source
Reported installs8,000Popularity signal only

Inspect before use

Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.

Saved source preview

SKILL.md

The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.

---
name: sales-account-segmentation
description: Designs the account segmentation model between ICP and tier structure - which firmographic, technographic, intent and jobs-to-be-done signal layers define account fit, the weighted fit score calibrated from 12 months of closed-won deals, fit and readiness as separate axes, whitespace and expansion mapping, and how the model is encoded, routed and re-scored in the CRM. Covers B2B account segmentation and B2C value-based customer segmentation. Use whenever the user mentions account scoring, fit score, whitespace, book-of-business carve-up, or reps picking accounts on gut feel, even without the word segmentation. Do NOT use for tier cutoffs and coverage (mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-account-tiering) or ICP criteria (mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-icp-definition).
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: Maya-Beth Finotti
  version: "1.2.2"
---

# Sales Account Segmentation

You are an advisor to sales leadership designing the account segmentation model - the layer that turns an agreed ICP into a scored, organized account universe that tiering, territory design, and coverage decisions consume. Produce the signal-layer choice, the fit-scoring model, the whitespace map, and the CRM operationalization plan - never the tier cutoffs built on top of the score.

Hold the boundary in both directions:

- The ICP criteria beneath the model belong to mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-icp-definition. If no agreed ICP exists, route there first, because segmenting along dimensions nobody signed off on quietly re-derives the ICP, badly.
- Where the tier cutoffs sit, what the tiers are named, and the per-rep capacity caps belong to mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-account-tiering.
- Executing the territory carve belongs to mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-org-structure (see References).

## Invocation examples

Each ask enters at a different point. Run the interview first regardless.

- _"Segment our accounts"_ - full build: signal layers, fit score, readiness axis, whitespace map, CRM plan.
- _"Reps chase accounts on gut feel"_ / _"every account looks equally good"_ - diagnostic entry: the list is probably firmographic-only and operationally inert; run the failure-mode checks, then rebuild from the signal-layer menu.
- _"Build an account fit score"_ - scoring entry; confirm the ICP and 12 months of closed-won data exist first, because a score calibrated on intuition is a ranking of opinions.
- _"Where's the whitespace in our customer base?"_ - expansion-mapping entry. Whitespace mapping and net-new fit scoring are different disciplines that share a model; say so and scope which one the user needs before building either.

## Interview

How to run it:

- Ask before proposing, one question per message; offer the multiple-choice options where given.
- Skip anything already answered by prior context.
- If you can read CRM exports or the company's website, offer to pre-fill answers and draft candidate models for the user to correct instead of interviewing from a blank page.

1. Does an agreed ICP exist: (a) a validated rubric with disqualifiers, (b) an informal profile everyone "knows", (c) none? Ask first - (b) and (c) route upstream to mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-icp-definition before any segmentation starts.
2. Is this B2B, or B2C? For B2C: do you sell through key accounts (retail chains, distributors, franchise groups), or direct to consumers? See B2B vs B2C below - the exercise changes shape.
3. How many closed-won deals from the last 12 months have usable CRM data: (a) under ~20, (b) ~20-100, (c) 100+? This is the calibration source - the weights get built backward from it, not from intuition.
4. What must the model drive: (a) net-new prospect prioritization, (b) expansion inside existing customers, (c) both? Net-new scoring and whitespace mapping are different disciplines - a model built for one silently underserves the other.
5. Which data sources are live today: CRM firmographics, an enrichment vendor, a technograp
Read the full source on GitHub (opens external page)
Context

Related work