Skill detail
partner-marketplace-strategy
Decides which third-party marketplaces to list on, how much to invest, expected ROI, and when to delist — cloud marketplaces, app stores, and retail — with a readiness gate and weighted scorecard.
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: partner-marketplace-strategy description: Decide which third-party marketplaces to list on, how much to invest in each, what ROI to expect, and when to delist - marketplace prioritization for partner teams. Covers cloud marketplace listing strategy, SaaS app store and integration directory prioritization, and retail marketplace selection for ecommerce (1P vs 3P vs hybrid), with a readiness gate, weighted scorecard, and provenance-flagged ROI expectations. Use whenever the user mentions AWS, Azure or GCP marketplaces, an app store listing, an integration directory, or asks whether a marketplace listing is worth it, even if they never say marketplace strategy. Do NOT use for choosing which partner category to launch next - use mbfinotti/partnerships-skills@partner-ecosystem-expansion instead. license: MIT metadata: author: Maya-Beth Finotti version: "1.0.3" --- # Partner Marketplace Strategy Set the strategy for listing on third-party marketplaces: which ones, how deep, in what order, with what investment, and the condition that ends it. The working method assembles: - The list → transact → co-sell → scale capability ladder (broad B2B practitioner consensus). - Tackle's Cloud GTM Maturity Model (vendor-authored, it sells stage-by-stage tooling). - McFadyen Digital's Marketplace Maturity Model (consultancy-authored, B2C). - For reading the vendor landscape: the Canalys Global Co-Sell Software Leadership Matrix, IDC MarketScape marketplace assessments, and Gartner's PERM market guide (independent analyst), plus Jay McBain's ecosystem work as the most credible individual voice. No framework in this field has independent longitudinal validation. Every staged model is authored by a party selling the journey: use them as structure, not as evidence. The output is a decision artifact an executive funds: the Marketplace Strategy memo, never execution work. - Listing-form content, store optimization, and ad tactics belong elsewhere. - Per-partner economics, named-alliance ranking, and joint GTM plans hand off to sibling skills (see Reference). ## Interview Ask before strategizing. Ask one question per message, and offer multiple-choice answers when possible. Skip a question only when the user already gave the answer. - B2B software, consumer brand, or hybrid? - Product type and deployment model: SaaS, self-hosted/installable image, physical goods, services? - Price band: typical ACV or order value, and gross margin? How much margin can a platform take rate consume? - Which channels sell today, and does the direct motion already work repeatably? What is the evidence? - Where does target buyers' procurement already sit: committed cloud spend (and with which provider), a dominant retail platform, or neither? - Do buyers purchase through a marketplace today? Any committed-spend contracts among target accounts? - Who owns this decision, and who must approve it (revenue, finance, product - or ecommerce, marketing, finance)? - B2B: how is a marketplace-routed deal treated in sales compensation today - neutral, penalized, or undefined? - Operational capacity: metering/entitlement engineering, deal desk, tax/legal for B2B, or inventory, fulfilment, returns, retail-media budget for B2C? - What does success mean, in which metric, and by what date must the result land? - Is this a one-off revenue win this period, or a compounding procurement asset that pays over years? - What is the effort ceiling: engineering weeks available, deal-desk or fulfilment headcount, political capital for a comp-plan change, and how reversible the commitment must be? The last three answers re-rank every option menu in this skill. Say out loud which answer moved which option: - A hard near-term date promotes list-only and 3P, and demotes anything needing a build. - A compounding mandate promotes the private-offer and deep-platform-bet rungs. - A low effort ceiling deletes the channel/multiparty and hybrid rungs from the memo outright, rather thanRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)