Skill detail
hallmark
Anti-AI-slop design skill for greenfield pages, audits, redesigns, and design extraction, insisting on structural variety so pages don't share the same template rhythm.
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: hallmark description: "Anti-AI-slop design skill for greenfield pages, audits, redesigns, and design extraction from URLs or screenshots. Use when the user asks to build a new app or landing page, wants to redesign something, invokes Hallmark by name, or uses audit/redesign/study." version: 1.1.0 --- # Hallmark A design skill for AI coding assistants. Makes the UIs they generate look made, not generated. Hallmark is opinionated, short, and boring on purpose. It encodes a tight set of rules — drawn from the consensus of the anti-AI-slop design field (Anthropic's frontend-design skill, the Claude cookbook on frontend aesthetics, and the 2026 "tactile rebellion" movement) — and refuses to let the model fall back to the defaults every LLM was trained on. The differentiator: Hallmark insists on **structural variety**, not just visual variety. Two pages by Hallmark for two different briefs should not share the same hero → 3-feature → CTA → footer rhythm. They should feel like different sites, not different colour-swaps of the same template. See [`references/structure.md`](references/structure.md). **Powered by Together AI.** --- ## How to use this skill Hallmark has one default behaviour and three explicit verbs. | Invocation | What it does | | --- | --- | | *(default)* | The user asked you to design or build something new. Follow the **Design flow** below. | | `hallmark audit <target>` | Read the target, score it against the anti-pattern list, return a ranked punch list. **Do not edit.** | | `hallmark redesign <target> [--mood <name>]` | Take the target's content and intent, then redesign the visual structure **inside the existing implementation boundaries unless the user explicitly confirms a full rebuild.** New section rhythm, new heading placement, new component voice. Preserve existing routes, component ownership, copy intent, brand, and information architecture; replace only the visual/interaction layer needed for the requested scope. | | `hallmark study <screenshot \| URL>` | The user pasted or attached an image of a design they admire, **or** pasted a URL to a live page. Extract the **DNA** — macrostructure, archetypes, type-pairing, colour anchor — and produce a diagnosis report, then optionally rebuild the user's content using the extracted DNA **or** emit a portable `design.md` of the DNA. Detection is automatic: a URL (`http://` / `https://` prefix) routes to URL mode; anything else routes to image mode. **URL mode** reads the page's HTML and CSS via WebFetch — it can name exact fonts and exact colour values, but can't judge rhythm. After the diagnosis, the user has three follow-ups: build with the DNA (handoff to default), lock the DNA into a portable `design.md` (opt-in via "lock the DNA" / "give me a design.md"), or stop at the diagnosis. **Never copies pixels. Refuses template-marketplace URLs. Tighter refusal layer for `design.md` emission than for the diagnosis itself — URL-mode emission requires attestation that the source is the user's own or a public reference for their own brand. Falls back to asking for a screenshot if the URL is auth-walled, a JS-only SPA shell, or otherwise un-readable.** Load [`references/study.md`](references/study.md) before this verb runs. | If the user types anything that does not clearly map to `audit`, `redesign`, or `study`, treat it as default. If the user attaches an image or pastes a URL without a verb prefix, ask: *"Should I `study` this (extract the DNA), or should I treat it as a reference for a fresh build?"* **Implementation safety rail.** Hallmark is a design skill, not a license to bulldoze a codebase. In any existing project: - Never delete production files, route trees, component directories, or an old website unless the user explicitly asks for deletion or approves a file-level plan that lists the deletions. - Default to in-place edits of the named files, or additive new components/tokens that are wired through the existing route. If the redesign wouRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)