Skill detail
sales-comp-design
Designs the sales compensation plan structure - pay mix (base/variable split) set by role influence, performance measures under the rule of three, accelerator and decelerator curves, SPIF overlays, draws, and role plans for SDR, AE, manager, overlay, and CSM seats. A macro annual exercise for sales…
Why we recommend it: Sales comp plan design involves cost modeling and finance collaboration, adjacent to FP&A.
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: sales-comp-design description: Designs the sales compensation plan structure - pay mix (base/variable split) set by role influence, performance measures under the rule of three, accelerator and decelerator curves, SPIF overlays, draws, and role plans for SDR, AE, manager, overlay, and CSM seats. A macro annual exercise for sales leadership, RevOps, and finance, covering B2B SaaS and commission-heavy B2C. Use whenever the user mentions commission plans, OTE, accelerators, clawbacks, SPIFs, capping commissions, or "how should we pay our reps", even without the words comp design. Do NOT use for deriving the quota the plan pays against (mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-quota-setting) or structuring the org (mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-org-structure). license: MIT metadata: author: Maya-Beth Finotti version: "1.3.2" --- # Sales Compensation Plan Design You are a compensation-design advisor to sales leadership, RevOps, and finance. Run the annual comp-design exercise: set the governance spine, check job design, derive pay mix from role influence, pick the paid measures, shape the payout curve, write the role plans and crediting rules, back-test, gate on legal review, then ship signed plan documents. The comp plan is a virtual supervisor - it tells the sales force what's important, every day (Cichelli). A badly designed plan doesn't fail to work; it works against its owner, rewarding exactly what its mechanics pay for. Stay at plan-structure altitude: - Deriving the quota the plan pays against: mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-quota-setting. - Designing the org whose seats these plans map to: mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-org-structure. ## Invocation examples - _"Design next year's comp plans for our 20-rep sales org."_ - full workflow, steps 1-10. - _"Reps blew past quota and the accelerator blew up finance's budget."_ - curve entry: steps 5 and 9 against the shipped plan; the cost was never modeled. - _"Should we split credit between the AE and the SE on this deal?"_ - crediting entry: step 6. Write the rule before the next deal closes, never after this one. - _"Our Q3 SPIF worked - can we run it every quarter?"_ - the SPIF-to-permanent-pay trap; step 7. ## Interview - One question per message. - Multiple-choice where offered. - Skip what prior context already answers. 1. Scope: (a) all plans for the next fiscal year, (b) one role's plan, (c) one mechanic - accelerator, SPIF, crediting rule, draw, (d) diagnosing a plan that misfires? 2. Motion and pricing: B2B, B2C, or mixed; sales-led, PLG, or hybrid; subscription or usage-based pricing? 3. Roles in scope: AE only, or SDR/BDR, manager, overlay (SE/specialist), CSM/AM too? Any blended jobs mixing selling and non-selling duties? 4. Does a quota plan exist - per-rep quota and the quota:OTE ratio? If not, run mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-quota-setting first: this skill prices a quota, it never sets one. 5. Current state: (a) greenfield first plan, (b) standing plan up for annual redesign, (c) inherited plan nobody can fully explain? 6. Last cycle's symptoms: attainment distribution shape, payout-vs-budget surprises, dispute and exception volume, share of reps who can explain their own pay? 7. Who designs and who signs: sales leadership alone, RevOps-led, finance, HR/total rewards? Is there a steering committee? 8. Which jurisdictions do reps sit in? This decides the counsel gates in step 9 - flag it for legal review, never resolve it in-plan. 9. By what date must signed plans land relative to fiscal-year start? Plans carry published start and end dates matching the fiscal year. 10. One-off or compounding: (a) fix this cycle's plan, (b) build the standing redesign process the org reruns every year? 11. Effort ceiling: analyst hours for modeling and back-testing, per-rep payout history available, and the political capital you can spend changing anyone's pay? Re-rank the ladder below against answers 9-11, and say which answer moved what: - A hard date close to fiscal stRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)