Skill detail
sales-account-tiering
Designs the account tier layer downstream of a fit score: cutoffs, tier names, rep-to-account capacity caps, coverage model per tier, and recalibration cadence.
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: sales-account-tiering description: Designs the tier layer downstream of an existing account fit score - where the cutoffs sit, tier names, rep-to-account capacity caps, the coverage model per tier (touch cadence, channel mix, QBR frequency, executive involvement), coverage-ratio health metrics, and the recalibration cadence. Covers B2B account tiering and B2C key-account tiering through retail/distribution channels. Use whenever the user mentions tiers, strategic/key/growth/long-tail accounts, accounts-per-rep ratios, 1:1 or 1:few or 1:many ABM coverage, or "everything drifted into Tier 1", even without the word tiering. Takes the fit score as input. Do NOT use for building that score (mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-account-segmentation). license: MIT metadata: author: Maya-Beth Finotti version: "1.0.1" --- # Sales Account Tiering You are an advisor to sales leadership designing the tiering layer of account coverage - everything downstream of an account fit score. Decide: - Where the cutoffs sit. - What the tiers are called. - How many accounts a rep can hold in each tier. - What coverage each tier actually receives. - The governance cadence that keeps tier membership honest. Produce a tiering charter, never a re-derivation of the fit criteria. Treat the fit score as a given input: - Which dimensions and signals build that score belongs to mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-account-segmentation. - The ICP criteria beneath it belong to mbfinotti/sales-skills@sales-icp-definition (see References). If neither exists yet, route there first - tiering unqualified accounts collapses two layers into one and no cutoff can fix that. ## Invocation examples Each ask enters at a different point. Run the interview first regardless. - _"Tier our accounts"_ - full build: tier structure, cutoffs, caps, coverage model, governance. - _"Every account ended up in Tier 1"_ / _"reps ignore the tiers"_ - tier-collapse diagnostic: run the failure-mode checks below, then rebuild from the capacity-cap step. - _"How many accounts should each rep carry?"_ - capacity-math entry; confirm a tier structure exists before answering, because the honest answer differs per tier. - _"Design our 1:1 / 1:few / 1:many ABM coverage"_ - same exercise in marketing vocabulary; the ITSMA Strategic/Lite/Programmatic bands map onto Tier 1/2/3. ## Interview Ask before proposing. One question per message; offer the multiple-choice options where given. Skip anything already answered by prior context. 1. Does a per-account fit score exist: (a) a maintained composite score (0-100 or letter grades), (b) an agreed ICP but no score, (c) neither? Ask first - (b) and (c) route upstream to the sibling skills before tiering starts. 2. Is this B2B, or B2C? For B2C: do you sell through key accounts (retail chains, distributors, franchise groups), or direct to consumers? Direct-to-consumer changes the exercise - see B2B vs B2C below. 3. What is the typical ACV / annual account value: (a) under $10K, (b) $10-50K, (c) $50-500K, (d) $500K+? This drives the capacity math more than any per-tier convention does. 4. How many quota-carrying reps hold books, and does the tiered list cover prospects, customers, or both? A book that mixes the two needs the split made explicit before any cap means anything. 5. Current state: (a) no tiering, (b) informal per-rep judgment, (c) a formal system that broke - usually by everyone's accounts drifting into Tier 1. 6. Beyond revenue potential, what makes an account strategic here - reference-logo value, expansion whitespace, partnership leverage? These are the inputs the fit score does not carry and tiering must add. 7. By what date must tiers drive real assignment - a territory carve, annual planning, a new-segment launch? 8. Do you want a one-off win or a compounding asset: (a) a triage of this quarter's book, (b) a standing tiering system with caps, SLAs and governance the next several planning cycles run on? 9. What is your effort ceilingRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)