Skill detail
product-lens
Validates the why before building through four product diagnostics: a YC-style product diagnostic producing a PRODUCT-BRIEF.md with go/no-go, a founder review scoring PMF signals, a user journey audit, and ICE feature prioritization.
Why we recommend it: Product validation and PMF diagnostics are core founder planning work.
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: product-lens description: Validate the why before building through four product diagnostics — a YC-style product diagnostic that produces PRODUCT-BRIEF.md with a go/no-go recommendation, a founder review scoring product-market-fit signals, a user journey audit measuring time-to-value, and ICE feature prioritization. Use when pressure-testing product direction, choosing between features, sanity-checking a launch, or converting a vague idea into a product brief. metadata: origin: ECC --- # Product Lens — Think Before You Build This lane owns product diagnosis, not implementation-ready specification writing. If the user needs a durable PRD-to-SRS or capability-contract artifact, hand off to `product-capability`. ## When to Use - Before starting any feature — validate the "why" - Weekly product review — are we building the right thing? - When stuck choosing between features - Before a launch — sanity check the user journey - When converting a vague idea into a product brief before engineering planning starts ## How It Works ### Mode 1: Product Diagnostic Like YC office hours but automated. Asks the hard questions: ``` 1. Who is this for? (specific person, not "developers") 2. What's the pain? (quantify: how often, how bad, what do they do today?) 3. Why now? (what changed that makes this possible/necessary?) 4. What's the 10-star version? (if money/time were unlimited) 5. What's the MVP? (smallest thing that proves the thesis) 6. What's the anti-goal? (what are you explicitly NOT building?) 7. How do you know it's working? (metric, not vibes) ``` Output: a `PRODUCT-BRIEF.md` with answers, risks, and a go/no-go recommendation. If the result is "yes, build this," the next lane is `product-capability`, not more founder-theater. ### Mode 2: Founder Review Reviews your current project through a founder lens: ``` 1. Read README, CLAUDE.md, package.json, recent commits 2. Infer: what is this trying to be? 3. Score: product-market fit signals (0-10) - Usage growth trajectory - Retention indicators (repeat contributors, return users) - Revenue signals (pricing page, billing code, Stripe integration) - Competitive moat (what's hard to copy?) 4. Identify: the one thing that would 10x this 5. Flag: things you're building that don't matter ``` ### Mode 3: User Journey Audit Maps the actual user experience: ``` 1. Clone/install the product as a new user 2. Document every friction point (confusing steps, errors, missing docs) 3. Time each step 4. Compare to competitor onboarding 5. Score: time-to-value (how long until the user gets their first win?) 6. Recommend: top 3 fixes for onboarding ``` ### Mode 4: Feature Prioritization When you have 10 ideas and need to pick 2: ``` 1. List all candidate features 2. Score each on: impact (1-5) × confidence (1-5) ÷ effort (1-5) 3. Rank by ICE score 4. Apply constraints: runway, team size, dependencies 5. Output: prioritized roadmap with rationale ``` ## Output All modes output actionable docs, not essays. Every recommendation has a specific next step. ## Integration Pair with: - `/browser-qa` to verify the user journey audit findings - `/design-system audit` for visual polish assessment - `/canary-watch` for post-launch monitoring - `product-capability` when the product brief needs to become an implementation-ready capability planRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)