Skill detail
open-code-review-delegate
Delegation mode where the host agent performs the review while ocr handles file selection and rule resolution deterministically.
Needs (stated): CLI tool
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: open-code-review-delegate description: > Delegation mode for open-code-review (OCR). Instead of OCR calling an LLM endpoint, this skill instructs the host agent to perform the code review itself, using OCR only for deterministic engineering: file selection and rule resolution. Use when the host agent should drive the review with its own LLM capabilities. license: Apache-2.0 compatibility: > Requires the `ocr` CLI installed (via `npm install -g @alibaba-group/open-code-review` or GitHub release binary). Does NOT require a configured LLM endpoint — delegation mode is LLM-free on the OCR side. metadata: author: alibaba homepage: https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review version: "1.0.0" --- # Open Code Review — Delegation Mode This Codex plugin skill intentionally mirrors the canonical skill at `skills/open-code-review-delegate/SKILL.md`. Keep both files synchronized when updating OCR delegation instructions; a symlink is avoided because plugin installs may only materialize the plugin subtree. A skill for performing AI code review where OCR provides deterministic engineering (file filtering, rule resolution) and the host agent performs the actual review using its own intelligence and tools. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Preview — Determine What to Review ```bash ocr delegate preview --format json [--from <ref> --to <ref>] [--commit <hash>] [--exclude <patterns>] ``` This outputs: - **mode** (workspace / range / commit) - **from / to / commit / merge_base** — ref metadata for constructing git commands - **Reviewable file list** — paths, status, insertions/deletions - **Excluded files** — with exclusion reason **Common invocations:** | Scenario | Command | |----------|---------| | Workspace changes | `ocr delegate preview` | | Branch comparison | `ocr delegate preview --from main --to feature` | | Single commit | `ocr delegate preview -c abc123` | ### Step 2: Get Rules for Files ```bash ocr delegate rule --format json <path1> <path2> ... ``` Pass the reviewable file paths from Step 1. Output is grouped by rule content — files sharing the same rule appear under one group, avoiding repetition. ### Step 3: Get Diffs Use git directly based on the mode/ref info from Step 1: **Range mode** (merge_base provided in preview output): ```bash git diff <merge_base>..<to> -- <path> ``` **Commit mode**: ```bash git show <commit> -- <path> ``` **Workspace mode**: ```bash # Tracked files git diff HEAD -- <path> # New untracked files — read directly (entire file is new code) cat <path> ``` ### Step 4: Review Each File Create a checklist containing every `reviewable_files` entry. For each reviewable file: Use `(path, status)` as the checklist identity. Workspace mode can report the same path twice when a staged deletion is followed by an untracked recreation. 1. Get its diff (Step 3) 2. Consult its Rule Group (from Step 2) for the review checklist 3. Conduct a thorough review, using appropriate context tools as needed 4. Mark the file `reviewed`, or `skipped` with a concrete reason For large changes, review in bounded batches grouped by shared rules and diff size. Do not stop after finding the first high-severity issue. ### Step 5: Format Output Each comment must follow this structure: | Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | path | string | yes | Relative file path | | content | string | yes | Review comment describing the issue | | start_line | integer | no | Start line in the new file | | end_line | integer | no | End line in the new file | | category | enum | no | bug, security, performance, maintainability, test, style, documentation, other | | severity | enum | no | critical, high, medium, low | ### Step 6: Classify and Report Before reporting, verify that every previewed file is accounted for. Include `total_files`, `reviewed_files`, `skipped_files`, and `coverage_rate` in the summary. A skipped file must include its reason. Group findings bRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)