Skill detail
inspired-product
Framework for empowered product teams covering discovery vs delivery, opportunity assessment, product vision/strategy, and outcome-driven roadmaps.
Why we recommend it: Empowered product teams, discovery/delivery dual-track, opportunity assessment, vision and strategy — core PM strategy and discovery work.
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: inspired-product description: 'Build empowered product teams using discovery and delivery dual-track. Use when the user mentions "product discovery", "empowered teams", "feature factory", "opportunity assessment", "product vision", "product strategy", "what should we build", or "our roadmap is just a feature list". Also trigger when restructuring teams away from output-driven models, or deciding what to build next based on outcomes. Covers discovery techniques, team structure, opportunity assessment, vision/strategy, and continuous delivery. For customer interviews, see mom-test. For ongoing discovery systems, see continuous-discovery.' license: MIT metadata: author: wondelai version: "1.4.0" --- # Empowered Product Teams Framework Framework for building products customers love through empowered teams that own continuous discovery and delivery. The best product companies don't ship features -- they solve problems, and they give teams the autonomy and accountability to figure out how. ## Core Principle **Empowered product teams** = cross-functional groups given problems to solve (not features to build) who own discovery and delivery end-to-end. Most product failures come not from bad engineering or design but from building things nobody wants. Feature teams receive roadmaps and execute; empowered teams receive objectives and discover solutions. The difference between a feature factory and an innovation engine is whether teams are missionaries (driven by vision and empathy) or mercenaries (driven by a handed-down backlog). ## Scoring **Goal: 7/7.** Score product team structures, discovery practices, or delivery processes by the Quick Diagnostic below -- **1 point per satisfied row**, scored 0-7. Bands: **6-7** = empowered teams own outcomes and discovery runs continuously with engineers; **4-5** = discovery happens but inconsistently, or teams own output with partial outcome accountability; **<=3** = a feature factory: teams receive a roadmap of dated features and skip discovery. Always state the current score and the specific failed diagnostic rows to fix to reach 7/7. ## Framework ### 1. Product Discovery vs Delivery **Core concept:** Product work runs on two parallel tracks: discovery determines what to build by addressing risks before engineering investment; delivery builds production-quality software. Most organizations skip discovery entirely, jumping from idea to backlog to sprint. **Why it works:** Discovery is cheap and fast; delivery is expensive and slow. Validating ideas before committing engineering avoids the most common failure mode: building something nobody wants. **Key insights:** - Discovery answers four risks: value (will customers use it?), usability (can they figure it out?), feasibility (can we build it?), viability (does it work for the business?) - Discovery output is validated ideas backed by evidence, not PRDs or specifications - Run 10-20 discovery iterations per feature that reaches delivery -- most ideas won't work, so fail fast and cheap - Discovery is not a phase; it runs continuously alongside delivery, with engineers participating **Product applications:** | Context | Application | Example | |---------|-------------|---------| | New feature | Validate all four risks before committing | Prototype-test onboarding flow with 5 users before building | | Roadmap prioritization | Prioritize strongest discovery evidence | Ship the feature with 4/5 successful user tests, not the CEO's request | | Sprint planning | Feed backlog from validated discovery output | Only discovery-tested items enter the sprint | **Ethical boundary:** Never cherry-pick discovery evidence to justify a conclusion you already chose; report the tests that failed alongside the ones that passed. See [references/discovery-techniques.md](references/discovery-techniques.md) when planning a discovery cycle -- the four-risks framework, a 5-stage interview script, prototyping techniques, and concrete evidenceRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)