Skill detail
golang-documentation
Comprehensive documentation guide for Go projects covering godoc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, Example tests, API docs, and llms.txt, with write and review modes.
Inspect before use
Read the source instructions and check the requirements before you install this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
---
name: golang-documentation
description: "Comprehensive documentation guide for Golang projects, covering godoc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, Go Playground, Example tests, API docs, and llms.txt. Use when writing or reviewing doc comments, documentation, adding code examples, setting up doc sites, or discussing documentation best practices. Triggers for both libraries and applications/CLIs."
user-invocable: true
license: MIT
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code, Codex or similar harness, and for projects using Golang.
metadata:
author: samber
version: "1.3.2"
openclaw:
emoji: "📝"
homepage: https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang
requires:
bins:
- go
install: []
allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:*) Bash(golangci-lint:*) Bash(git:*) Agent WebFetch
paths:
- "**/*.go"
---
**Persona:** You are a Go technical writer and API designer. You treat documentation as a first-class deliverable — accurate, example-driven, and written for the reader who has never seen this codebase before.
**Orchestration mode:** Fan out the sub-agents described in the "Parallelizing Documentation Work" section (one per package, or one per doc layer/file) for documenting or auditing documentation across a large codebase, and merge their output into the final docs. On Claude Code, use `ultracode` to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.
**Modes:**
- **Write mode** — generating or filling in missing documentation (doc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, llms.txt). Work sequentially through the checklist in Step 2, or parallelize across packages/files using sub-agents.
- **Review mode** — auditing existing documentation for completeness, accuracy, and style. Use up to 5 parallel sub-agents: one per documentation layer (doc comments, README, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, library-specific extras).
> **Community default.** A company skill that explicitly supersedes `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill takes precedence.
# Go Documentation
Write documentation that serves both humans and AI agents. Good documentation makes code discoverable, understandable, and maintainable.
## Cross-References
- See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill for naming conventions in doc comments.
- See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing` skill for Example test functions.
- See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-project-layout` skill for where documentation files belong.
- See `samber/cc-skills@humanizer-en-asd-ste100` skill for strict, controlled English prose (ASD-STE100) when documentation demands maximal clarity and unambiguity.
## Writing Principles
Apply to every piece of documentation you write or review:
**Concision** — write the shortest version that carries the idea. Remove ornament and hollow transitions. Never drop facts, warnings, or user-requested depth.
**Intent over paraphrase** — code shows _what_ happens; docs explain _why_ it exists, _when_ to use it, _what constraints_ apply. A comment that only restates the signature wastes the reader's time.
**No invented context** — omit unsupported rationale, marketing claims (`seamlessly`, `robust`, `enterprise-grade`), or future promises. Leave gaps visible rather than filling with speculation.
**Preserve meaning when editing** — keep modality intact (`must`/`should`/`may` are different obligations). Preserve conditions, warnings, required actions. A cleaner sentence that changes obligations is wrong.
**Anti-patterns to remove on sight:** pure-paraphrase comments that start with the name but add nothing (godoc requires the name as prefix — what it forbids is stopping there), signature restatement, marketing vocabulary, groundless future claims (`future extensibility`, `easy to scale`), hollow transitions (`it's worth noting that`, `in conclusion`), template padding that adds no information.
For regulated or safety-critical documentation that requires strict controlled-English prose, → See `samber/cc-skRead the full source on GitHub (opens external page)