contract-review

The saved excerpt is a snapshot from when this skill was listed. The external source remains the complete and most current version.

---
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# CLAUDE OFFICE SKILL - Enhanced Metadata v2.0
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

# Basic Information
name: contract-review
description: "Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and more."
version: "1.0.0"
author: claude-office-skills
license: MIT

# Categorization
category: legal
tags:
  - contract
  - review
  - risk-analysis
  - legal
  - compliance
department: Legal

# AI Model Compatibility
models:
  recommended:
    - claude-sonnet-4
    - claude-opus-4
  compatible:
    - claude-3-5-sonnet
    - gpt-4
    - gpt-4o

# MCP Tools Integration
# Skills = Solution Guide (WHAT + HOW)
# MCP = Tool Provider (WITH WHAT)
mcp:
  server: office-mcp
  tools:
    - extract_text_from_pdf
    - extract_text_from_docx
    - analyze_document_structure
  optional_tools:
    - create_docx
    - docx_to_pdf

# Knowledge Base Integration
# Knowledge = Domain expertise as structured data
knowledge:
  base:
    - mcp-servers/office-mcp/knowledge/base/risk_patterns.json
    - mcp-servers/office-mcp/knowledge/base/completeness.json
  jurisdictions:
    - mcp-servers/office-mcp/knowledge/base/jurisdictions/us.json
    - mcp-servers/office-mcp/knowledge/base/jurisdictions/china.json
    - mcp-servers/office-mcp/knowledge/base/jurisdictions/eu.json
  custom:
    # Users can add their own knowledge files here
    # Example: ./knowledge/my_company_rules.json

# Skill Capabilities (for discovery/matching)
capabilities:
  - contract_analysis
  - risk_identification
  - legal_compliance_check
  - negotiation_recommendations

# Input/Output Specification
input:
  required:
    - type: file
      formats: [pdf, docx, txt]
      description: The contract document to review
    - type: text
      name: party_role
      description: Which party you are (employee, contractor, buyer, etc.)
  optional:
    - type: text
      name: jurisdiction
      description: Legal jurisdiction (US, EU, China, UK)
    - type: text
      name: concerns
      description: Specific areas of concern

output:
  primary:
    type: report
    format: markdown
    sections:
      - risk_summary
      - detailed_findings
      - completeness_check
      - negotiation_priorities

# Language Support
languages:
  - en
  - zh

# Related Skills
related_skills:
  - nda-generator
  - offer-letter
  - contract-template
---

# Contract Review Skill

## Overview

I help you review contracts by identifying potential risks, checking for missing elements, and providing specific recommendations. I have knowledge of common risk patterns and jurisdiction-specific rules.

**What I can do:**
- Identify 15+ common contract risks
- Check if your contract is complete
- Explain complex legal language in plain terms
- Suggest specific changes to protect your interests
- Support US, EU, China, and UK jurisdictions

**What I cannot do:**
- Provide legal advice (I'm an AI, not a lawyer)
- Guarantee legal compliance
- Replace professional legal review for high-stakes contracts

---

## How to Use Me

### Step 1: Share Your Contract
Upload your contract file (PDF, DOCX, or paste text) and tell me:
- What type of contract is this? (employment, NDA, service, lease, etc.)
- Which party are you? (employee, contractor, buyer, seller, etc.)
- What jurisdiction/country?
- Any specific concerns?

### Step 2: I Will Analyze
I'll review the contract and provide:
1. **Risk Summary** - High/Medium/Low risks found
2. **Clause Analysis** - Specific problematic clauses
3. **Completeness Check** - Missing standard elements
4. **Recommendations** - What to negotiate or change

### Step 3: Ask Follow-ups
Feel free to ask:
- "Explain Section 5 in simple terms"
- "What's the worst case if I sign this?"
- "How do I negotiate the non-compete clause?"
- "Is this normal for [industry]?"

---

## Risk