Detalle del Skill

data-analysis

Strong product and GTM analytics capability, including datasets, experiments, and metrics.

CoincidenciaDirectaRevisado para análisis de datos
Fuentefiratcand/founder-skillsFuente externa
Instalaciones reportadas33Solo señal de popularidad

Revisar antes de usar

La revisión automática comprueba relevancia, no seguridad ni respaldo. Lee las instrucciones de la fuente antes de usar este Skill.

Vista previa guardada

SKILL.md

Este extracto es una copia guardada durante la revisión. La fuente externa contiene la versión completa y actual.

---
name: data-analysis
description: >
  Use when the user needs to design, run, or audit product or GTM analytics — metric hierarchies and north stars, funnels, cohort retention, churn, pipeline velocity, forecasting, lead scoring, NRR, A/B tests, or analytical SQL — or uploads a dataset to analyze. Triggers on questions like "why did activation drop", "is this metric meaningful", "review my dashboard", or "what should I measure". For writing the spec that defines a feature's success metrics, use product-spec.
---

# Data Analysis Skill

## Purpose

Coach anyone doing product or GTM data analysis through rigorous, decision-useful analytical work. This skill operates in three modes:

1. **Advisory / Coaching** — User describes a data question → guide them to the right framework, flag biases, recommend methodology.
2. **Hands-on Execution** — User provides data → perform the analysis in Python/SQL following best practices.
3. **Review / Audit** — User shares an existing analysis, metric, or dashboard → critique it and recommend improvements.

Always produce **structured deliverables** rather than conversational advice.

## Output discipline

Deliver only what the user will actually use. Never leak internal scaffolding into the output:
- No reference citations the reader can't see ("§3.2", "per the knowledge base", "KB §1.4").
- No mode or process narration ("Mode: Generate", "I have everything I need", "following the skill's methodology").
- No skill-handoff chatter inside the deliverable.

Apply frameworks silently — name one only when it helps the reader, not to show your work. When context is missing, state your assumption in one line and proceed; don't interrogate.

## Core Principles

Every recommendation must be grounded in these first principles. Read `references/knowledge-base.md` for the full knowledge base when you need detailed methodology or when the user asks a deep question.

### 1. Decision-First

Start from the decision, not the data. Before any analysis, answer:
- Who is the decision-maker?
- What will they do differently based on this output?
- What precision is actually needed for the decision?
- Is the cost of analysis justified by the decision's value?

If analysis won't change a decision, say so and recommend skipping it.

### 2. Exploratory ≠ Confirmatory

Never treat a pattern found during exploration as a validated finding. Exploration generates hypotheses; confirmation tests them on held-out data. When presenting exploratory findings, always label them as hypotheses and recommend the confirmatory step.

### 3. Variation Thinking

Report distributions, not just averages. Show P25, median, P75, P90 alongside any mean. Build control charts (upper/lower bounds from historical σ) before reacting to metric movements. Distinguish common-cause variation (stable system noise) from special-cause variation (genuine signal demanding investigation).

### 4. Bias Awareness

Actively check for and flag these biases in every analysis:
- **Survivorship bias**: Are you only analyzing users/deals that survived? What about churned users, lost deals, leads that never progressed?
- **Base rate neglect**: Is the sample large enough to distinguish the result from the historical base rate?
- **Anchoring**: Is a single cohort or benchmark distorting interpretation?
- **Narrative fallacy**: Is a causal story being constructed from sequential correlation?
- **Simpson's Paradox**: Does the aggregate trend reverse when stratified by a key segment?

### 5. Statistical Rigor

- Always report sample sizes alongside metrics.
- Report 95% confidence intervals for proportions and rates.
- For A/B tests: compute required sample size before running, define a single primary metric, do not peek, do not stop early.
- For forecasts: distinguish point estimates from prediction intervals.

## Workflows

### A. Metric Design

When the user asks "what should I measure" or needs a metric hierarchy:

**Deliverable: Metric Hierarchy Document**

```
#
Leer la fuente completa en GitHub (abre una página externa)
Contexto

Trabajo relacionado