Skill 详情
research-lookup
Builds manuscript evidence packets but does not draft papers.
使用前先检查
自动化审核只检查相关性,不代表安全审查或推荐。使用前请阅读来源中的说明。
SKILL.md
这段内容是审核时保存的快照。外部来源才是完整且最新的版本。
---
name: research-lookup
description: "Compile current scholarly evidence for a scientific manuscript or research brief. Use when the user explicitly asks to gather literature, references, background evidence, competing findings, or a manuscript research packet. Uses Parallel Search by default, Parallel Extract for source verification, Parallel Research for explicitly deep/exhaustive work, optional explicit Parallel Chat, and optional Perplexity only when requested or allowed as a failure fallback."
license: MIT license
compatibility: Requires network access to api.parallel.ai through parallel-cli 0.7.1+ for Search, Extract, and Research; explicit Chat uses api.parallel.ai with PARALLEL_API_KEY; optional Perplexity requests use openrouter.ai and require OPENROUTER_API_KEY.
metadata:
version: "1.4"
skill-author: K-Dense Inc.
openclaw:
primaryEnv: PARALLEL_API_KEY
envVars:
- name: PARALLEL_API_KEY
required: false
description: Parallel API key; CLI login may be used instead.
- name: OPENROUTER_API_KEY
required: false
description: Optional OpenRouter key for explicit Perplexity use.
---
# Research Lookup
Compile the external evidence needed to plan and write a high-quality scientific
manuscript. The default academic workflow targets **60 verified, unique references**
and produces a manuscript-ready research packet rather than a loose list of links.
## Scope and boundaries
Use this skill when the user explicitly wants:
- literature and background research for a manuscript
- many high-quality academic references
- evidence supporting or contradicting a scientific claim
- a structured evidence matrix or claim-to-source map
- current studies, methods precedent, mechanisms, limitations, or research gaps
Do not activate it for casual factual questions that do not need research, private
or unpublished material, or a claim that can be answered from user-provided files.
Query text is sent to Parallel. It is sent to OpenRouter only when Perplexity is
explicitly selected or the user enables that fallback.
This skill compiles **external evidence**. It cannot supply the user's unpublished
study data, decide what their Results show, or guarantee systematic-review
completeness. For a PRISMA-style systematic review, use `literature-review` for
protocols, database-specific searching, screening, exclusion reasons, and risk of
bias.
## Parallel-first routing
| Need | Backend | Selection |
|---|---|---|
| Manuscript literature and references | Parallel Search + Extract | Default; use `--academic` |
| Fast bounded web lookup | Parallel Search | Use `--no-academic` |
| Deep/exhaustive multi-source report | Parallel Research | Explicit `--force-backend research` |
| OpenAI-compatible synthesis with research basis | Parallel Chat | Explicit `--force-backend chat` |
| Optional alternative academic search | Perplexity via OpenRouter | Explicit or enabled failure fallback |
Important compatibility behavior:
- A bare script query uses **Parallel Search**. Chat Completions remains available
only through explicit backend selection.
- `--force-backend parallel` remains an alias for explicit Parallel Research.
- Academic keywords select the multi-pass Parallel academic strategy; they do not
silently switch the provider to Perplexity.
- `--batch`, `--json`, `-o/--output`, the `ResearchLookup` class, progress output,
and the existing result envelope remain supported.
## Recommended manuscript workflow
### 1. Capture manuscript context
Use the user's available context to constrain retrieval:
- research question or hypothesis
- study type
- population or biological/technical system
- intervention or exposure
- comparator
- outcomes
- field and date range
- target journal, if known
The script accepts a JSON object through `--context-file`. Do not invent missing
study details. A bare topic is supported, but the packet will flag its section briefs
as broad.
Example:
```json
{
"research_question": 在 GitHub 阅读完整来源 (打开外部页面)