Skill 详情

deep-research

General exhaustive multi-source research with citations and confidence.

匹配类型直接匹配已针对 深度研究 审核
来源petekp/agent-skills外部来源
报告安装量30仅表示受欢迎程度

使用前先检查

自动化审核只检查相关性,不代表安全审查或推荐。使用前请阅读来源中的说明。

已保存的来源预览

SKILL.md

这段内容是审核时保存的快照。外部来源才是完整且最新的版本。

---
name: deep-research
description: |
  Conduct exhaustive, citation-rich research on any topic using all available tools: web search, browser automation, documentation APIs, and codebase exploration. Use when asked to "research X", "find out about Y", "investigate Z", "deep dive into...", "what's the current state of...", "compare options for...", "fact-check this...", or any request requiring comprehensive, accurate information from multiple sources. Prioritizes accuracy over speed, cross-references claims across sources, identifies conflicts, and provides full citations. Outputs structured findings with confidence levels and source quality assessments.
---

# Deep Research

Systematic methodology for conducting exhaustive, accurate research using all available tools. Prioritizes correctness over speed.

## Core Principles

1. **Multiple sources required** — Never rely on a single source for important claims
2. **Cross-reference everything** — Verify facts appear consistently across independent sources
3. **Citation mandatory** — Every claim must have a source; no unsourced assertions
4. **Acknowledge uncertainty** — When sources conflict or are weak, say so explicitly
5. **Prefer primary sources** — Official docs > blog posts > forum answers > AI-generated content

## Available Research Tools

Use these tools in combination based on the research topic:

| Tool | Best For | Limitations |
|------|----------|-------------|
| **WebSearch** | Current events, recent information, broad topic discovery | Results may be outdated, SEO-influenced |
| **WebFetch** | Reading specific URLs, extracting detailed content | Requires known URL |
| **Playwright browser** | Interactive sites, paywalled content (if logged in), complex navigation | Slower, requires more tokens |
| **Context7/MCP docs** | Library/framework documentation | Only indexed libraries |
| **OpenAI docs MCP** | OpenAI API specifics | OpenAI only |
| **Grep/Glob/Read** | Codebase research, finding implementations | Local files only |

## Research Workflow

### Phase 1: Scope Definition

Before researching, clarify:

1. **Core question** — What specific question(s) need answering?
2. **Required depth** — Surface overview or exhaustive deep-dive?
3. **Recency requirements** — Is timeliness critical? (API versions, current events, etc.)
4. **Authoritative sources** — What would count as a definitive answer?

Ask clarifying questions if scope is ambiguous. Use AskUserQuestion for structured choices when multiple research directions are possible.

### Phase 2: Source Discovery

Cast a wide net to find relevant sources:

```
1. WebSearch with multiple query variations
   - Try 3-5 different phrasings of the core question
   - Include technical terms AND plain language
   - Search for "[topic] official documentation"
   - Search for "[topic] research paper" or "[topic] study"

2. Identify authoritative sources from results
   - Official documentation sites
   - Academic papers / research institutions
   - Industry standards bodies
   - Recognized experts in the field

3. Check specialized tools
   - Context7 for library/framework docs
   - OpenAI docs MCP for OpenAI-specific topics
   - GitHub/codebase for implementation details
```

**Source discovery heuristics:**
- Government and academic domains (.gov, .edu, .ac.uk) tend toward accuracy
- Official project documentation is authoritative for that project
- Wikipedia is a starting point, not an endpoint — follow its citations
- Stack Overflow answers need verification; check votes and dates
- Be skeptical of content farms and SEO-optimized listicles

### Phase 3: Deep Reading

For each promising source:

1. **Fetch full content** — Use WebFetch or browser to get complete text
2. **Extract key claims** — Note specific facts, figures, dates, quotes
3. **Note source metadata** — Author, date, organization, potential biases
4. **Identify citations** — What sources does this source cite?
5. **Flag conflicts** — Does this contradict 
在 GitHub 阅读完整来源 (打开外部页面)
相关上下文

相关工作