Skill detail

decision-eval

Supports architectural decision scoring, but only as a downstream ADR workflow utility.

MatchPossibleReviewed for architects
Sourceavelikiy/great_ctoExternal source
Reported installs31Popularity signal only

Inspect before use

Automated review checks relevance, not safety or endorsement. Read the source instructions before using this skill.

Saved source preview

SKILL.md

The saved excerpt is a snapshot from review. The external source remains the complete and most current version.

---
name: decision-eval
description: Spawns the decision-scorer agent after architect proposes 2+ variants in an ADR. Produces a weighted scoring table and recommended choice saved to docs/decisions/.
when_to_use: |
  Apply when:
  - architect has written an ADR with 2+ alternatives under ## Alternatives Considered or ## Options
  - architect is about to finalize a multi-variant decision and needs an objective tie-breaker
  - CTO explicitly requests scoring before gate:arch approval
  Do NOT apply when:
  - The change is a bug fix, docs-only, or style/formatting update
  - The ADR has only 1 option (no real alternatives)
  - User says "skip scoring" or "no scoring"
  - project_size is nano (overhead exceeds value)
effort: medium
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Bash, Agent
paths:
  - "docs/decisions/**"
  - "docs/architecture/**"
  - ".great_cto/PROJECT.md"
---

# Decision Eval — automated scoring for architectural alternatives

Invoke after architect proposes 2+ variants, before creating gate:arch.

## When to invoke

Invoke this skill when ALL of these are true:

1. An ADR (`docs/decisions/ADR-*.md`) or ARCH doc (`docs/architecture/ARCH-*.md`)
   contains a section with 2 or more named alternatives (look for
   `## Alternatives Considered`, `## Options`, or bold-prefixed options like
   `**Option A:**`)
2. The architect has not yet created `gate:arch`
3. The user has not said "skip scoring", "no scoring", or "skip decision-eval"
4. `project_size` in PROJECT.md is NOT `nano`

Skip silently (do not even mention) if any condition fails.

## How to invoke

Read the most recent ADR or ARCH doc to confirm 2+ variants exist, then spawn
the `decision-scorer` agent with the file path as context:

```bash
# Identify target document
TARGET=$(ls -t docs/decisions/ADR-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -z "$TARGET" ] && TARGET=$(ls -t docs/architecture/ARCH-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)

# Confirm 2+ variants
VARIANT_COUNT=$(grep -cE "^\*\*[A-Za-z]|^### [A-Za-z]|^- \*\*[A-Za-z]" "$TARGET" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
```

If `VARIANT_COUNT >= 2`, dispatch the agent:

```
Agent: decision-scorer
Context: <TARGET file path>
Task: Score the architectural variants in <TARGET> against .great_cto/PROJECT.md criteria.
      Save output to docs/decisions/.
```

## Output location

The decision-scorer agent saves results to:
```
docs/decisions/DECISION-<slug>-<YYYYMMDD>.md
```

After the agent completes, read the output file and surface the recommendation
to the architect:

```
Decision scoring complete:
  Recommended: <variant name> (<score>/5.00)
  Runner-up:   <variant name> (<score>/5.00)
  Full report: docs/decisions/DECISION-<slug>-<YYYYMMDD>.md

Architect: review the scoring rationale before accepting or overriding the recommendation.
```

## Skip conditions

Output nothing and proceed to the next step if:
- `project_size: nano` in PROJECT.md
- Fewer than 2 variants found in the ADR/ARCH doc
- User message contains "skip scoring" or "skip decision-eval" or "no scoring"
- The target document is a bug-fix or docs-only ADR (check title for "fix:", "docs:", "chore:")

## Integration with architect workflow

This skill sits between Step 4 (Write ADR) and Step 5 (Create gate:arch) in
`agents/architect.md`. Architect invokes it by name:

```
Invoke skill: decision-eval
```

After scoring completes, architect may:
- Accept the recommendation → proceed to gate:arch with the recommended option
- Override the recommendation → document rationale in the ADR under a new
  `## Scoring Override` section before creating gate:arch
Read the full source on GitHub (opens external page)
Context

Related work