Skill detail

bug-bounty-workflow

End-to-end bug bounty organization workflow centered on program rules and reporting.

MatchDirectReviewed for bug bounty
Sourcemasriyan/gemini-security-skillsExternal source
Reported installs1Popularity signal only

Inspect before use

Automated review checks relevance, not safety or endorsement. Read the source instructions before using this skill.

Saved source preview

SKILL.md

The saved excerpt is a snapshot from review. The external source remains the complete and most current version.

---
name: bug-bounty-workflow
description: Bug bounty workflow skill for program scope mapping, recon-to-report automation, deduplication against prior submissions, and high-signal reporting on HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack, and self-hosted programs. Use to organize bounty work end to end while staying inside program rules.
---

# Bug Bounty Workflow

## Program Rules First

- Parse and pin the program brief: in-scope, out-of-scope, allowed techniques, rate, retesting, safe harbor, disclosure.
- Refuse any step that violates program rules or applicable law, even if technically possible.
- Track per-target state so you never test out-of-scope assets accidentally.

## Workflow

1. Scope ingest: domains, mobile apps, APIs, source repos, partner services; tag each with `in/out/maybe` and rate.
2. Recon: passive OSINT, subdomain/asset discovery, screenshot, tech fingerprint, content discovery; store as snapshots.
3. Triage surface: prioritize high-value endpoints (auth, payments, admin, file upload, SSO, webhook, API gateway).
4. Test: auth/authorization, IDOR, SSRF, RCE, business logic, secrets exposure, race conditions; minimize impact.
5. Reproduce cleanly: minimal steps, no extra access, redacted PoC, controlled test accounts.
6. Dedupe: search prior public disclosures, hacker activity, changelogs; cross-check internal notes.
7. Report: clear title, severity rationale (CVSS + program rubric), impact narrative, reproduction, remediation.

## Quality Bar

- One vulnerability per report. Chain only when chaining is the bug.
- Include log/HTTP evidence with secrets redacted, plus suggested fix and detection.
- Offer collaborative retest after the fix.

## Output Contract

- `programs/<name>/scope.yaml`, `recon/`, `notes.md`, `reports/<id>.md`, `metrics.csv` (submissions, accepted, paid, dupes).
Read the full source on GitHub (opens external page)
Context

Related work