Skill detail
academic-research-suite
Includes dedicated workflows for drafting, revising, and preparing academic papers.
Inspect before use
Automated review checks relevance, not safety or endorsement. Read the source instructions before using this skill.
SKILL.md
The saved excerpt is a snapshot from review. The external source remains the complete and most current version.
--- name: academic-research-suite description: > ARS-Codex workflows for research, academic writing, manuscript review, research-to-paper pipelines, and experiment planning. Use when the user asks for deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, research question refinement, academic paper drafting, paper revision, citation or integrity checks, reviewer simulation, peer review, editorial decision letters, research-to-paper workflows, experiment execution planning, statistical interpretation, or human study protocol support. Korean triggers: 논문 심사, 논문 수정, 초록 작성, 체계적 문헌고찰, 연구부터 논문까지. Also use for Claude-style ARS command aliases such as /ars-plan, ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-3w, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, /ars-reviewer, /ars-mark-read, /ars-unmark-read, /ars-cache-invalidate, /ars-rebuttal-audit, and /ars-full. This skill vendors ARS role prompts, references, templates, and shared handoff schemas under ars/. metadata: version: "0.1.24" upstream_suite: "academic-research-skills" codex_adapter: true allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, Bash(uv *), Bash(python *), Bash(python3 *) --- # ARS-Codex This is a Codex adapter for the ARS suite. The vendored ARS content lives under `ars/`; keep it as source material and route through this file first. ## Versioning This Codex package is version `0.1.24`. The repo-root `VERSION`, this `SKILL.md` metadata version, and `manifest.json` `adapter_version` must match. Vendored ARS suite versions are tracked separately by source repository commit in `manifest.json`. ## First Rule Do not load the whole suite by default. Select one workflow, read that workflow's `WORKFLOW.md`, then load only the agent, reference, template, or shared files needed for the user's current stage. The internal workflow entry files are named `WORKFLOW.md`, not `SKILL.md`, so Codex registers only this root router skill instead of exposing every vendored upstream workflow as a separate skill. ## Workflow Router Choose the workflow by intent: | User intent | Read first | |---|---| | Deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, fact-checking, research question refinement | `ars/deep-research/WORKFLOW.md` | | Academic paper writing, paper outline, abstract, revision, citation formatting, AI disclosure, LaTeX/DOCX/PDF formatting guidance | `ars/academic-paper/WORKFLOW.md` | | Paper review, peer review simulation, editorial decision, reviewer calibration, re-review after revision | `ars/academic-paper-reviewer/WORKFLOW.md` | | End-to-end research-to-paper pipeline, integrity gate, staged review/revision/finalization workflow | `ars/academic-pipeline/WORKFLOW.md` | | Experiment planning, code experiment execution plan, human study protocol, statistical interpretation, reproducibility validation | `ars/experiment-agent/WORKFLOW.md` | If the request spans multiple workflows, start with `ars/academic-pipeline/WORKFLOW.md` unless the user clearly asked for a single phase. ### Paper Topic Scoping Override Apply this override before the general paper/pipeline routing rule and before the Claude-Style Alias Router below. The override applies regardless of whether the user invokes ARS via natural language or via an `ars-*` alias. If the user says they want to write a paper, thesis, proposal, article, journal article, or manuscript, but they only provide a broad topic, tentative title, research interest, or "題目/主題/方向" and do **not** provide a clear, answerable research question, route to `ars/deep-research/WORKFLOW.md` in `socratic` mode first. This matches the upstream ARS experience where vague paper-topic requests start with SCR/Socratic narrowing instead of immediate outline or drafting. Treat these as Socratic triggers even when the wording contains paper-writing intent: - "I want to write a paper on ..." - "I have a paper topic/title ...Read the full source on GitHub (opens external page)