Skill 詳細
content-writing
Directly covers website copy, articles, headlines, readability, and persuasive structure.
使用前に確認
自動レビューは関連性のみを確認し、安全性や推奨を保証しません。使用前に出典の説明を読んでください。
SKILL.md
これはレビュー時に保存された抜粋です。完全で最新の内容は外部ソースを確認してください。
--- name: content-writing description: Use when writing or reviewing website copy, articles, headlines, ledes, persuasive content, readability, or scannable structure. metadata: portable: true compatible_with: - Codex - codex --- # Content Writing Skill Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178. ## Required Inputs | Input | Required | Use | |---|---|---| | Decision, audience, and deliverable | yes | Bound the business outcome | | Source evidence, constraints, and owner | yes | Ground recommendations and accountability | | Approved budget, customer data, or production artefacts | conditional | Support high-impact execution | ## Capability and permission contract Default to read-only analysis and drafting. Do not publish, send, price, promise, alter customer records, commit budget, or modify production artefacts without explicit authority and a named approver. Minimise confidential data, preserve provenance, and keep reversible copies. ## Degraded mode If evidence, stakeholder decisions, specialist tooling, or authoritative commercial data are unavailable, deliver a labelled draft, checklist, or decision memo. State what was not verified and do not claim approval, publication, financial accuracy, or customer acceptance. ## Decision rules | Condition | Action | Stop condition | |---|---|---| | Output creates a commercial, customer, or delivery commitment | Obtain named approval before release | Authority or terms are unclear | | Evidence supports a reversible draft | Produce it with assumptions and owner | Required evidence conflicts | | Tooling or data is incomplete | Specify validation | A final executable artefact is expected | ## Domain Anti-Patterns - Inventing customer evidence, prices, benchmarks, or approvals. Fix: cite the source or mark the gap. - Publishing or sending a draft without authority. Fix: retain draft status and name the approver. - Hiding assumptions inside polished prose. Fix: expose them beside each affected decision. - Polishing presentation while the decision remains unclear. Fix: resolve audience, owner, and acceptance criteria. - Treating unavailable tooling as passed validation. Fix: record the unassessed check. <!-- dual-compat-start --> ## Use When - Copywriting and content creation standards for website pages, blog posts, and all written copy. Covers headlines, ledes, readability, niche vocabulary, scannable formatting, and persuasive structure. Cross-cutting skill — apply whenever... ## Workflow - For premium products, websites, proposals, or sales assets, write content that proves authority, qualifies buyers, supports SEO/GEO and digital PR, explains value in business terms, and leads to a concrete next action. ## Evidence Produced | Category | Artifact | Format | Example | |----------|----------|--------|---------| | UX quality | Page copy review | Markdown doc covering headline, lede, body, and CTA per page against the content-writing standard | `docs/content/page-copy-review-checkout.md` | ## References - Use the `references/` directory for deep detail after reading the core workflow below. - Pair with `premium-software-product-execution` when copy must support premium pricing, buyer trust, service packaging, sales follow-up, or website-as-marketing-asset requirements. <!-- dual-compat-end --> Professional copywriting standards for website copy, blog posts, articles, and all written content. This is a cross-cutting skill — apply these principles whenever creating or editing text for any page. ## The Reader-First Rule Every word exists for the reader, not the writer. Before writing anything, answer: - **Who** is the reader? What do they already know? - **What** are they looking for? What problem brought them here? - **Why** should they care? What benefit do they gain? - **What proof** would make them believe us? - **What action** should a qualified buyer take next? Write for the reader all the time. That is what separates conGitHub で全文を読む (外部ページ)