Detalle del Skill
research-paper-writing
Direct manuscript drafting, revision, and reviewer-response support.
Revisar antes de usar
La revisión automática comprueba relevancia, no seguridad ni respaldo. Lee las instrucciones de la fuente antes de usar este Skill.
SKILL.md
Este extracto es una copia guardada durante la revisión. La fuente externa contiene la versión completa y actual.
---
name: research-paper-writing
description: >
Draft and revise ML, CV, NLP, and systems research papers with strong claim-evidence
flow, reviewer-aware structure, and submission-ready section planning. Use when the
user needs help with an abstract, introduction, related work, method, experiments,
ablations, discussion, figures/tables, checklist coverage, or rebuttal / response-letter
writing for a paper. Triggers on: research paper, academic paper, ML paper, NeurIPS paper,
ICLR paper, CVPR paper, experiments section, ablation plan, related work, contribution
framing, reviewer response, rebuttal, camera-ready revision.
allowed-tools: Bash Read Write Edit Glob Grep WebFetch
license: MIT
metadata:
tags: research-paper-writing, academic-writing, ml, cv, nlp, experiments, rebuttal
version: "1.1"
source: akillness/jeo-skills
---
# research-paper-writing
Use this skill when the job is not generic prose cleanup, but turning research work into a **defensible manuscript package**.
The center of gravity is:
- contribution framing,
- claim → evidence alignment,
- section-level structure,
- figure/table support,
- reviewer-facing completeness,
- rebuttal and camera-ready revision.
Read these support notes before drafting or revising:
- [references/claim-evidence-packet.md](references/claim-evidence-packet.md)
- [references/experiment-and-figure-coverage.md](references/experiment-and-figure-coverage.md)
- [references/rebuttal-and-camera-ready.md](references/rebuttal-and-camera-ready.md)
## When to use this skill
- Drafting or rewriting an abstract around concrete claims and measurable evidence
- Structuring an introduction so motivation, gap, method, and contributions land quickly
- Turning notes, code results, or slide bullets into a method section with reproducible detail
- Designing experiment, ablation, error-analysis, or figure/table coverage for a paper
- Writing related work that positions the paper instead of listing references
- Tightening a rebuttal, reviewer response, or camera-ready revision plan under strict limits
- Checking whether the manuscript actually supports each promised contribution
## When not to use this skill
- The request is an internal design doc, ADR, architecture note, or engineering runbook → use `technical-writing`
- The request is an API portal, SDK reference, or developer-facing product documentation problem → use `api-documentation`
- The request is an end-user tutorial, onboarding guide, or FAQ → use `technical-writing`
- The request is a slide deck, investor pitch, roadmap deck, or game pitch → use `presentation-builder`
- The request is broad marketing or launch messaging rather than academic publication → use `marketing-automation`
- The request is only citation collection / literature discovery without manuscript writing or revision pressure
## Instructions
### Step 1: Lock the paper contract
Before writing, define this packet:
```yaml
paper_contract:
target_venue: "conference / journal / workshop"
primary_problem: "one-sentence problem statement"
core_claim: "the single strongest contribution"
evidence_required:
- benchmark or empirical proof
- ablation or mechanism check
- failure case / limitation / scope note
audience: "reviewers / readers / subcommunity"
constraints:
page_or_word_limit: "..."
anonymity_or_style_rules: "..."
must_keep_sections:
- abstract
- intro
- method
- experiments
- rebuttal / response letter
```
If the core claim or required evidence is fuzzy, fix that first. Weak framing leaks into every section.
### Step 2: Map each claim to proof
Build a quick claim-evidence table before drafting:
| Claim | Evidence needed | Supporting figure/table | Risk if missing |
|-------|-----------------|-------------------------|-----------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
Do not let a headline contribution survive without an experiment, ablation, analysis, or explicit scope boundary.
### StepLeer la fuente completa en GitHub (abre una página externa)