Detalle del Skill

product-management

PM workflow for product analysis, gaps, prioritization, PRDs, and roadmap work.

CoincidenciaDirectaRevisado para gerentes de producto
Fuenteooiyeefei/cccFuente externa
Instalaciones reportadas18Solo señal de popularidad

Revisar antes de usar

La revisión automática comprueba relevancia, no seguridad ni respaldo. Lee las instrucciones de la fuente antes de usar este Skill.

Vista previa guardada

SKILL.md

Este extracto es una copia guardada durante la revisión. La fuente externa contiene la versión completa y actual.

---
name: product-management
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze my product", "research competitors", "find feature gaps", "create feature request", "prioritize backlog", "generate PRD", "plan roadmap", "what should we build next", "competitive analysis", "gap analysis", "sync issues", or mentions product management workflows. Provides AI-native PM capabilities for startups with signal-based feature tracking, the WINNING prioritization filter, and GitHub Issues integration with deduplication.
version: 0.2.0
---

# Product Management Skill

AI-native product management for startups. Transform Claude into an expert PM that processes signals, not just feature lists.

## Core Philosophy

```
WINNING = Pain × Timing × Execution Capability
```

Filter aggressively from 50 gaps to 3-5 high-conviction priorities. Expert PMs track **signals** with confidence scores, timestamps, and velocity.

## Commands Quick Reference

| Command | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `/pm:analyze` | Scan codebase + interview for product inventory |
| `/pm:landscape` | Research competitor landscape |
| `/pm:gaps` | Run gap analysis with WINNING filter |
| `/pm:file` | Batch create GitHub Issues for approved gaps |
| `/pm:prd` | Generate PRD and create GitHub Issue |
| `/pm:sync` | Sync local cache with GitHub Issues |

## Agents

This plugin provides specialized agents for autonomous tasks:

| Agent | Triggers On | Purpose |
|-------|-------------|---------|
| `research-agent` | "research [competitor]", "scout [name]" | Deep autonomous web research |
| `gap-analyst` | "find gaps", "what should we build" | Systematic gap identification with scoring |
| `prd-generator` | "create PRD for [feature]" | Generate PRD + create GitHub Issue |

## Data Storage

All data stored in `.pm/` folder at project root:

```
.pm/
├── config.md                 # Positioning, scoring weights
├── product/                  # Product inventory, architecture
├── competitors/              # Competitor profiles
├── gaps/                     # Gap analyses with scores
├── requests/                 # Synced GitHub Issues (for dedup)
├── prds/                     # Generated PRDs
└── cache/last-updated.json   # Staleness tracking
```

See `references/data-structure.md` for complete file templates.

## WINNING Filter Scoring

Hybrid scoring approach - Claude suggests researchable criteria, user scores domain-specific:

| Criterion | Scorer | Source |
|-----------|--------|--------|
| Pain Intensity (1-10) | Claude | Review sentiment, support data |
| Market Timing (1-10) | Claude | Search trends, competitor velocity |
| Execution Capability (1-10) | User | Architecture fit, team skills |
| Strategic Fit (1-10) | User | Positioning alignment |
| Revenue Potential (1-10) | User | Conversion/retention impact |
| Competitive Moat (1-10) | User | Defensibility once built |

**Total: X/60** → Recommendation:
- **40+** → FILE (high conviction)
- **25-39** → WAIT (monitor)
- **<25** → SKIP (not worth it)

See `references/winning-filter.md` for detailed scoring criteria.

## Deduplication & Sync

Prevent duplicate feature requests by syncing with GitHub Issues:

### On Session Start
1. Check `.pm/cache/last-updated.json` for staleness
2. If >24 hours since last sync, prompt for `/pm:sync`

### `/pm:sync` Process
1. Fetch all GitHub Issues with `pm:*` labels via `gh issue list --json`
2. Update `.pm/requests/[issue-number].md` for each issue
3. Update `last-updated.json` timestamp

### Deduplication During Gap Analysis
1. Load existing issues from `.pm/requests/`
2. For each new gap, fuzzy match against existing:
   - Title similarity (Levenshtein): 40% weight
   - Keyword overlap: 30% weight
   - Label match: 20% weight
   - Description similarity: 10% weight
3. Mark gaps as:
   - **EXISTING** (>80% match) → Show linked issue
   - **SIMILAR** (50-80%) → Warn, ask user
   - **NEW** (<50%) → Proceed normally

### Output Format
```markdown
| Gap | WINNING | Status
Leer la fuente completa en GitHub (abre una página externa)
Contexto

Trabajo relacionado