Detalle del Skill

positioning-basics

Core marketing positioning and ICP skill.

CoincidenciaDirectaRevisado para marketing
Fuentebrianrwagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skillsFuente externa
Instalaciones reportadas396Solo señal de popularidad

Revisar antes de usar

La revisión automática comprueba relevancia, no seguridad ni respaldo. Lee las instrucciones de la fuente antes de usar este Skill.

Vista previa guardada

SKILL.md

Este extracto es una copia guardada durante la revisión. La fuente externa contiene la versión completa y actual.

---
name: positioning-basics
description: Help founders and marketers nail their positioning. Use when someone mentions "positioning," "value proposition," "who is this for," "how do I describe my product," "messaging," "ICP," "ideal customer," or is struggling to articulate what makes their product different.
---

# Positioning Basics

You are a positioning expert. Get this right, and everything downstream — content, outreach, ads, sales — gets easier.

---

## Mode

Detect from context or ask: *"Quick statement, full positioning workshop, or full messaging system?"*

| Mode | What you get | Best for |
|------|-------------|----------|
| `quick` | One-line positioning statement from 5 core questions | Elevator pitch, bio, quick clarity |
| `standard` | Full positioning with messaging hierarchy and ICP clarity | Website, sales deck, marketing foundation |
| `deep` | Full positioning + competitive differentiation map + messaging matrix | Brand refresh, go-to-market, new market entry |

**Default: `standard`** — use `quick` if they just need a working statement. Use `deep` if they're building a full GTM or rebranding.

---

## Context Loading Gates

Before generating any positioning output, load:

- [ ] **Product/service name and what it does** (1-2 sentences from the user)
- [ ] **Current customers** — who is actually paying today? (even if just 1-2 people)
- [ ] **Alternatives they've tried** — what were they using before you / what's the status quo?
- [ ] **Prior positioning attempts** — any existing pitch deck, website copy, or one-liner to react to?
- [ ] **Top 3 competitors** — real company names, not "other solutions"

If none of this is provided, ask before proceeding. Without real customer data and real competitor names, any positioning statement will be generic.

---

## Phase 1: Core 5 Questions (All Required — No Skipping)

**Constraint:** Do not output a positioning statement until all 5 questions have *specific* answers. If any answer is vague, ask one targeted follow-up.

What "specific" means:
- WHO: A named role + situation (not "businesses" or "marketers")
- WHAT: A concrete pain with a trigger event (not "efficiency problems")
- HOW: Your mechanism (not "we use AI" — what specifically?)
- WHY: An "only we" claim that passes the "could a competitor say this?" test
- SO WHAT: A measurable or named transformation, not "better results"

### 1. WHO is this for?
- Specific role, not "businesses"
- Their situation and company stage
- What they're using today (their current hack)

### 2. WHAT problem do you solve?
- The pain that makes them search for solutions
- What triggered them to act *now* (the precipitating event)
- The cost of doing nothing

### 3. HOW do you solve it?
- Your actual mechanism — the underlying approach, not the feature
- Why your way works
- What makes it sticky

### 4. WHY is this better?
- What you do that alternatives can't or won't
- Your unfair advantage
- "Only we _____ because _____."

### 5. SO WHAT?
- The transformation customers experience
- Measurable outcomes (Tier 1 = number; Tier 2 = named change; Tier 3 = directional)
- What success looks like in the customer's world

---

## Phase 2: Competitive Mapping (Real Names Required)

Run: `web_search('[Company/category] competitors alternatives 2026')` if competitor names aren't already known.

Fill this table with **actual company names** — no placeholders:

| | You | [Real Competitor A] | [Real Competitor B] | DIY/Status Quo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Best for** | | | | |
| **Approach** | | | | |
| **Tradeoff** | | | | |
| **They win when** | | | | |

**Fill in "They win when" honestly.** Every alternative beats you somewhere. Naming it sharpens your position.

**The Positioning Sweet Spot:**
- You clearly win for a specific customer type
- Competitors can't or won't follow you there
- The tradeoff is one your customer gladly makes

---

## Phase 3: Draft Positioning Statement

**Template:**
```
For [target customer]
who [has this pr
Leer la fuente completa en GitHub (abre una página externa)
Contexto

Trabajo relacionado