Detalle del Skill

chinese-content-writing-guideline

Strong writing guidance, but limited to Traditional Chinese/Taiwan conventions.

CoincidenciaPosibleRevisado para redacción de contenido
Fuentejim60105/copilot-promptFuente externa
Instalaciones reportadas778Solo señal de popularidad

Revisar antes de usar

La revisión automática comprueba relevancia, no seguridad ni respaldo. Lee las instrucciones de la fuente antes de usar este Skill.

Vista previa guardada

SKILL.md

Este extracto es una copia guardada durante la revisión. La fuente externa contiene la versión completa y actual.

---
name: chinese-content-writing-guideline
description: >-
  Writing guidelines for producing high-quality Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) content.
  Use when writing any kind of content. Including blog posts, notes, technical articles, technical writing, chitchat, social media posts, etc., even when you are just sending a text message.
  Also use when reviewing or editing existing Chinese content for tone, style, and terminology compliance.
license: GFDL-1.3-or-later
metadata:
  author: [email protected]
---

# Chinese Content Writing Guidelines

This skill provides comprehensive writing guidelines for producing high-quality 正體中文 Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) content. Apply these rules to ensure consistent language, structure, tone, and terminology aligned with Taiwan conventions.

## Language and Formatting

- Write in **Traditional Chinese 正體中文** (zh-TW) with full-width punctuation(,。、;:「」『』()!?)
- Always insert a single space between Chinese characters and alphanumeric characters (e.g., `使用 Docker 建立`)
- Use standard Taiwan Traditional Chinese terminology for technical terms
- Address readers as 「讀者」「大家」「各位」 or 「你」, never 「您」
- Refer to the author as 「我」, never 「我們」

## Structure

- Use inverted pyramid structure: core conclusion and scope first, supporting evidence second
- Opening paragraph states the core conclusion and scope directly
- Subsequent paragraphs provide evidence and limitations
- Closing paragraph must not use slogan-style endings
- Use natural paragraphs with `##` and `###` subheadings
- Avoid bullet lists unless explicitly requested or justified; prefer prose
- Use markdown reference-style links for external sources only, not for internal links. Each reference link should appear only once in the article.
- Format all reference-style links using markdown so they display as "links." Use the webpage title (curl fetch it!) as the link text for each reference-style link.

## Tone and Style

- Friendly yet professional; approachable expert, not academic
- Neutral, restrained, verifiable
- Prioritize reader comprehension over ornate rhetoric
- Factual presentation with clear argumentation

## Output Principles

1. **Facts First**: All judgments must rest on verifiable data, case studies, or explicit logic. No vague attributions like 「研究指出」 or 「資料顯示」
2. **Direct Statement**: Prefer neutral, verifiable declarative and conditional sentences
3. **De-templated Rhythm**: Avoid mechanical three-point structures and symmetrical parallelism
4. **Clear Communication**: One point per sentence. Break long sentences with commas or semicolons

## Hard Constraints

### Rhetorical Device Quotas

- **Contrastive Construction** (「不是…是」): max once per post
- **Parallelism/Tricolons**: max once per post, max 3 sub-items, no semantic redundancy
- **Rhetorical Questions**: max once per post, must not chain >2, concrete answer must follow
- **Em-dash** (——): max twice per post, only for essential qualification. Never use it twice per section. Must not be used to stack adjectives or emotional content.

### Punctuation Constraint

Avoid using colons in the middle of sentences: Use commas instead to revise them into smooth sentences. This does not apply to bulleted or listed items.

### Banned Phrases

Never use the following expressions:

「總的來說」 「不只...更...」 「不僅...也...」 「...能有效...」 「往往」 「至關重要」 「精心打造」 「確保」 「直接講」 「先講」 「提醒我們」 「差別不在於...而在於...」 「一個...另一個」 「就像...」 「表面上...,...時,可能截然不同」 「這不是...是...」 「...問題也值得關注」 「一個事實」 「關鍵差異」 「最可怕的不是...」 「核心問題」 「不是...而是...」 「令人不安的事實」 「坐不住」 「系統性地」 「很精準」 「只有...才能...」 「誠實面對」 「不舒服」 「不太舒服」 「很清楚」 「講清楚」 「非常清楚」 「清晰」 「精準地」 「把這件事算得很死」 「認出了自己」 「結構性的」 「守得住」 「守不住」 「收在這裡」

### Additional Prohibitions

- Avoid reduplicated words
- Avoid hedging phrases like 「可以說」「某種程度上」「在多數情況下」; replace with conditional qualifications
- Avoid saying things like 「我想了很久」 「我停下來想了一下」 「停下來很久」, or "being dissected" / "reading an autopsy report."
- Avoid using 「鏡子」 or related concepts to describe feelings or things. Only use 鏡子 when referring to an actual mirr
Leer la fuente completa en GitHub (abre una página externa)
Contexto

Trabajo relacionado