Skill-Details

writing-web

Direct web development guidance for HTML, CSS, JavaScript, HTMX, accessibility, and verification.

ÜbereinstimmungDirektGeprüft für webentwicklung
Quellealexei-led/claude-code-configExterne Quelle
Gemeldete Installationen8Nur Popularitätssignal

Vor Nutzung prüfen

Die automatische Prüfung bewertet Relevanz, nicht Sicherheit oder Empfehlung. Lies vor der Nutzung die Quellanweisungen.

Gespeicherte Quellvorschau

SKILL.md

Dieser Auszug wurde bei der Prüfung gespeichert. Die externe Quelle enthält die vollständige und aktuelle Version.

---
description: Simple web development with HTML, CSS, JS, and HTMX. Use when working
  with .html, .css, or .htmx files, web templates, stylesheets, or vanilla JS scripts.
  NOT for React/Vue/Angular (use writing-typescript) or Node.js backends.
name: writing-web
---

# Web Development

## Scope

- Use for HTML, CSS, HTMX, vanilla JS, and server-rendered templates.
- Do not use for React, Vue, Angular, TypeScript, Node.js backends, or app architecture.
- Follow existing template language, asset pipeline, framework, accessibility, and security conventions.
- Do not add a dependency, build step, or framework unless the project already uses it or the user approves.

## Reference Reads

- Read `references/patterns.md` before layout, behavior, accessibility, or security changes; skip for copy-only edits.

## Defaults

- Prefer semantic HTML and CSS; add HTMX or JS only when native browser behavior is insufficient.
- Use mobile-first, fluid CSS. Put repeated design tokens in custom properties; keep one-off values local.
- Preserve usable links and forms when practical.
- Treat accessibility, responsive behavior, and safe rendering as required behavior.
- Escape untrusted output; avoid `innerHTML` unless project sanitizer marks content trusted.

## Comments

- Use HTML comments only for template boundaries, generated blocks, or security assumptions that are not obvious from markup.
- Use CSS comments for non-obvious hacks, browser constraints, or integration boundaries.
- Use JS comments only for non-obvious constraints, invariants, side effects, tradeoffs, or browser quirks.
- Keep comments short. Move longer rationale to docs, issue links, or design notes.
- Do not comment obvious markup, selectors, declarations, or event handlers.
- Keep UI tests readable without comments; add one only for unobvious fixtures, browser setup, timing, or regression context.

## Verification

- Run project-configured format, lint, validation, tests, and browser checks for the changed files.
- For UI changes, check mobile and desktop widths plus keyboard navigation.
- For changed interactive behavior, run a browser test or state why it was skipped.
- If a check is unavailable, state the gap and run the closest configured gate.
- For rendered-browser verification (screenshots, live interaction, cross-viewport checks), use `browser-automation`.

## Failure Handling

- HTML or accessibility validation fails: fix the markup; do not suppress configured checks.
- HTMX request does not fire: check trigger, target, swap, response status, and CSRF/auth headers before adding JS fallback.
- Project conventions or checks are unclear: inspect config first; if still unclear, state the assumption and smallest safe gate.
- Broad, risky, or destructive change: state the risk and ask before acting. Do not run destructive commands.

## Final Response

- Files changed:
- Checks:
- Skipped checks:
- Risks/follow-ups:
Vollständige Quelle auf GitHub lesen (öffnet externe Seite)
Kontext

Verwandte Arbeit