Skill-Details
setup
Narrow experiment-loop component.
Vor Nutzung prüfen
Die automatische Prüfung bewertet Relevanz, nicht Sicherheit oder Empfehlung. Lies vor der Nutzung die Quellanweisungen.
SKILL.md
Dieser Auszug wurde bei der Prüfung gespeichert. Die externe Quelle enthält die vollständige und aktuelle Version.
---
name: "setup"
description: "Set up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator. Use when the user runs /ar:setup or asks to start optimizing a file with the autoresearch loop."
command: /ar:setup
---
# /ar:setup — Create New Experiment
Set up a new autoresearch experiment with all required configuration.
## Usage
```
/ar:setup # Interactive mode
/ar:setup engineering api-speed src/api.py "pytest bench.py" p50_ms lower
/ar:setup --list # Show existing experiments
/ar:setup --list-evaluators # Show available evaluators
```
## What It Does
### If arguments provided
Pass them directly to the setup script:
```bash
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py \
--domain {domain} --name {name} \
--target {target} --eval "{eval_cmd}" \
--metric {metric} --direction {direction} \
[--evaluator {evaluator}] [--scope {scope}]
```
### If no arguments (interactive mode)
Collect each parameter one at a time:
1. **Domain** — Ask: "What domain? (engineering, marketing, content, prompts, custom)"
2. **Name** — Ask: "Experiment name? (e.g., api-speed, blog-titles)"
3. **Target file** — Ask: "Which file to optimize?" Verify it exists.
4. **Eval command** — Ask: "How to measure it? (e.g., pytest bench.py, python evaluate.py)"
5. **Metric** — Ask: "What metric does the eval output? (e.g., p50_ms, ctr_score)"
6. **Direction** — Ask: "Is lower or higher better?"
7. **Evaluator** (optional) — Show built-in evaluators. Ask: "Use a built-in evaluator, or your own?"
8. **Scope** — Ask: "Store in project (.autoresearch/) or user (~/.autoresearch/)?"
Then run `setup_experiment.py` with the collected parameters.
### Listing
```bash
# Show existing experiments
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py --list
# Show available evaluators
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py --list-evaluators
```
## Built-in Evaluators
| Name | Metric | Use Case |
|------|--------|----------|
| `benchmark_speed` | `p50_ms` (lower) | Function/API execution time |
| `benchmark_size` | `size_bytes` (lower) | File, bundle, Docker image size |
| `test_pass_rate` | `pass_rate` (higher) | Test suite pass percentage |
| `build_speed` | `build_seconds` (lower) | Build/compile/Docker build time |
| `memory_usage` | `peak_mb` (lower) | Peak memory during execution |
| `llm_judge_content` | `ctr_score` (higher) | Headlines, titles, descriptions |
| `llm_judge_prompt` | `quality_score` (higher) | System prompts, agent instructions |
| `llm_judge_copy` | `engagement_score` (higher) | Social posts, ad copy, emails |
## After Setup
Report to the user:
- Experiment path and branch name
- Whether the eval command worked and the baseline metric
- Suggest: "Run `/ar:run {domain}/{name}` to start iterating, or `/ar:loop {domain}/{name}` for autonomous mode."
Vollständige Quelle auf GitHub lesen (öffnet externe Seite)