Skill-Details
human-writing
Comprehensive, fact-preserving drafting and revision for natural prose.
Vor Nutzung prüfen
Die automatische Prüfung bewertet Relevanz, nicht Sicherheit oder Empfehlung. Lies vor der Nutzung die Quellanweisungen.
SKILL.md
Dieser Auszug wurde bei der Prüfung gespeichert. Die externe Quelle enthält die vollständige und aktuelle Version.
--- name: human-writing description: "Use when drafting, rewriting, proofreading, diagnosing, or adapting source-grounded prose, especially technical articles, essays, tutorials, product notes, and social posts, while preserving facts, attribution, uncertainty, voice, and meaning. Supports private English-first reasoning for Chinese finals; not translation-only, fiction, or AI-detection evasion." --- # Human Writing ## Outcome Contract - **Outcome:** natural, source-grounded writing shaped for the requested reader and surface. - **Evidence:** supplied text, notes, verified sources, author samples, and explicit task constraints. - **Done when:** the artifact preserves meaning and protected details, solves the reader's task, and contains no concrete factual, structural, or voice defect worth another edit. - **Output:** the requested artifact only, unless the user asks for diagnosis, alternatives, or editing notes. ## Core Stance - Treat writing patterns as diagnostic signals, not a checklist or banned-word table. - The author's supported voice wins over a generic house style. - Over-editing is failure. Prefer fewer, stronger changes; leave already effective prose alone. - Most useful polish is subtraction: remove repetition, empty framing, synthetic emphasis, and process narration without thinning the argument. - Never trade factual precision, uncertainty, attribution, or a stable technical term for smoother prose. ## Workflow 1. **Lock the source.** Identify authoritative facts, judgments, unknowns, protected text, visibility limits, and claim status across the whole artifact. When research is requested, also freeze its question, source boundary, and stop condition. Apply `references/fact-integrity.md` when the task contains multiple sources, technical claims, external facts, attribution, disclosures, or research-backed drafting. 2. **Set the target.** Infer the primary operation, reader, purpose, language, length, platform, and genre from the request and source. Ask only about missing information that would materially change the result. 3. **Calibrate voice.** Prefer a supplied author sample, then the stance and confidence visible in the source, then a neutral precise voice. Never manufacture first-person experience or quirks. 4. **Choose the smallest useful structure.** Use a private outline for new long-form or multi-claim work. For an existing long artifact, map sections and repetition before restructuring. Skip planning ceremony for short or local edits. 5. **Draft or edit for substance.** Lead with the real question, scene, mechanism, or decision. Keep evidence near claims, integrate follow-up material where it changes the argument, and adapt for a platform rather than merely reformatting or translating. 6. **Run two passes.** First check facts, status, protected text, disclosures, and safety. Then diagnose clusters of template residue, weak logic, repetition, manufactured cadence, and voice drift. Fix only confirmed reader problems. 7. **Stop and return.** Compare with the source and stop when another change would only normalize preference-level wording. Return the requested artifact or `Not enough context:` with the minimum missing facts when completion would require invention. ## Modes - **Draft from source:** create prose from supplied or verified material without filling gaps with plausible fiction. - **Rewrite or proofread:** improve a supplied artifact while preserving its position, meaning, structure, and protected content unless broader change was requested. - **Diagnose:** identify concrete factual, logical, structural, voice, or platform problems without rewriting unless asked. - **Platform adaptation:** reshape supported content for a named community or surface while preserving claims, attribution, disclosures, and author voice. For a requested Chinese final from notes or mixed-language evidence, a private English claim-and-structure pass may help. Skip it for an existing Chinese draft or stronger ChVollständige Quelle auf GitHub lesen (öffnet externe Seite)