Skill-Details

essay

Writes essays only for a specific 213 theory-concept exposition format.

ÜbereinstimmungMöglichGeprüft für verfassen von essays
Quellejmg2027/dynamic-resolution-lattice-theory-Externe Quelle
Gemeldete Installationen1Nur Popularitätssignal

Vor Nutzung prüfen

Die automatische Prüfung bewertet Relevanz, nicht Sicherheit oder Empfehlung. Lies vor der Nutzung die Quellanweisungen.

Gespeicherte Quellvorschau

SKILL.md

Dieser Auszug wurde bei der Prüfung gespeichert. Die externe Quelle enthält die vollständige und aktuelle Version.

---
name: essay
description: Write a derivation-quality essay answer to a 213-concept question. Uses the derive+cite+dual-function+cross-frame+self-check+constructive-accessibility protocol to produce an essay that simultaneously interprets a classical concept and refines the 213 narrative.  Triggered by "essay" / "essay", "에세이", "교과서" / "교과서", "교과서 쓰기" / "교과서 쓰기", "213-style answer", "Mingu-style answer", "what is X (in 213)", "X가 213에서 뭐야".
---

# Essay derivation — 213-native concept exposition

A 213 question (limit / completeness / equality / residue / gauge / ...)
deserves more than a wiki paragraph or a Lean module pointer.  It
deserves an **essay** that simultaneously interprets the classical
concept (packaging stripped per G6 §0) and refines the 213 narrative
(operational primitive made syntactic).

This is the format `theory/` book content takes **on top** of the
89-chapter catalog index.  Catalog = static AST + reference.  Essay =
on-demand trajectory through catalog nodes for a specific query Lens.

## When to invoke

Trigger on:
  - "X가 뭐야 (in 213)" / "what is X" foundational questions
  - Concept clarifications (limit, completeness, equality, infinity,
    residue, set, function, distinguishing, gauge, ...)
  - Re-framings ("how does 213 see X?")
  - Adversarial probes ("does 213 have Y?", "where does 213 fail?")
  - Cross-concept connections ("how do X and Y relate?")

Do NOT invoke for:
  - Implementation tasks (Lean code, build verification, file moves)
  - Pure factual lookup ("what's in chapter X?")
  - Navigation ("where is Y defined?")
  - Already-answered questions

## Protocol (6 steps)

### 1 — Identify the 213-native target

Locate the `theory/` chapter(s) + `lean/E213/` modules + `seed/AXIOM/`
sections containing the 213-native expression.  Examples:

| Concept | Primary targets |
|---|---|
| limit | `theory/math/analysis/modulus.md` + `theory/math/analysis/cauchy.md` |
| completeness | `theory/math/numbersystems/real213.md` |
| equality | `theory/lens/algebra.md` + `theory/lens/universal.md` |
| residue | `seed/AXIOM/01_residue.md` + `theory/math/foundations/universe_chain.md` Möbius P |
| gauge | `theory/physics/symmetry/c3_chain.md` |
| infinity | `seed/AXIOM/06_lens_readings.md` §6.7 + `Lib/Math/Foundations/ResolutionLimit.lean` |

If no clear chapter exists, the concept may not be promoted yet —
flag this honestly; do not invent.

### 2 — State 213-native answer first (NOT classical contrast)

Open with the operational definition.  Do NOT lead with "in classical
math X means..."  — that imports the classical/213 dichotomy.

Bad: *"In classical analysis, a limit is ε-δ defined.  In 213,
instead, we use explicit modulus..."*

Good: *"A sequence paired with an explicit modulus function
`f : Nat → Nat`.  The pair IS the limit."*

### 3 — Derive from catalog with citations

Citations ARE the derivation, not bibliography.  Each claim points to
`theory/.../X.md` or `lean/E213/.../X.lean` or
`research-notes/G##_X.md` or `seed/AXIOM/##_X.md`.

Multi-chapter derivations are stronger than single-chapter
paraphrases.

### 4 — Dual function: interpretation + refinement in one move

After 213-native derivation, surface the dual:
  - **Interpretation**: this answer is the classical concept with
    redundant packaging stripped (per G6 §0 corrected position)
  - **Refinement**: 213's specific reading is sharper here

These are ONE act, not two paragraphs — per the dual-function
structural fact.

### 5 — Discover cross-frame connections

Watch for moments where the same structural fact appears in multiple
frames (atomic / Möbius / Lens / §8 / §9.2 / G31 / ...).  Surface
explicitly when discovered:

> "§8.1 no-exterior + §9.2 op-object non-separation + P(φ) = φ
> fixed-point + G31 trajectory-as-witness — same fact, four
> resolutions."

This emergence is what makes essays valuable beyond catalog lookups.
Do NOT force convergences that aren't there.

### 6 — Self-check (continuous, not endpoint)

Throughout, monito
Vollständige Quelle auf GitHub lesen (öffnet externe Seite)
Kontext

Verwandte Arbeit