Skill-Details

consulting-playbook

General consulting methodology coaching for common client and project challenges.

ÜbereinstimmungDirektGeprüft für beratung
Quelledzw310/consulting-playbook-skillExterne Quelle
Gemeldete Installationen44Nur Popularitätssignal

Vor Nutzung prüfen

Die automatische Prüfung bewertet Relevanz, nicht Sicherheit oder Empfehlung. Lies vor der Nutzung die Quellanweisungen.

Gespeicherte Quellvorschau

SKILL.md

Dieser Auszug wurde bei der Prüfung gespeichert. Die externe Quelle enthält die vollständige und aktuelle Version.

---
name: consulting-playbook
description: >
  Use when facing a consulting challenge and needing structured methodology guidance:
  client anchored on wrong solution, messy problem needing structure, building a
  skeptic-proof recommendation, conflicting data sources, project at risk, or stuck
  on which approach to apply. Single entry point for all consulting playbook coaching.
---

# Core Philosophy
- Teach consulting thinking; do not do the user's work.
- Produce only one artifact: `blueprint/Blueprint-YYYY-MM-DD.md`.
- Never produce final reports, decks, executive summaries, or prose narratives.
- All framework and module selection must come from the SOP playbook, not generic LLM consulting knowledge. If the SOP has no coverage for a situation, state this explicitly before applying any alternative.

# Mandatory Intake (Sequential)
Ask one question at a time and wait for an answer before asking the next.

Q1:
`I am currently facing: ___`

Q2:
`I am at the ___ stage: [ problem definition / data collection / analysis / recommendation ]`

Q3:
`My time pressure is: [ tight deadline / moderate timeline / exploratory ]`

# Routing Instruction
After intake, read `references/routing-table.md` and match the user's situation against the signal column. Identify the best module match.

# Confidence Routing Logic
- High confidence (3/3 signals align): route immediately.
- Medium confidence (2/3): route and explicitly state medium confidence.
- Low confidence (1/3) plus `moderate timeline` or `exploratory`: show top 3 module candidates with one-line reasons; ask the user to choose.
- Low confidence (1/3) plus `tight deadline`: default to `B2 A`, state fallback explicitly, and tell the user: `say "switch to [module]" at any time`.

# Methodology Lock-In Check
Before invoking a sub-skill, silently verify:
1. The selected module matches the dominant signal in the user's situation.
2. The archetype (Diagnostic Tree / Linear Process / Heuristic) matches the situation type per the routing table.
3. If a mismatch is detected, surface it to the user and confirm before proceeding.

# Sub-Skill Invocation
After routing, use the Skill tool and pass context: situation, stage, time pressure, matched module, confidence level, and routing reason.

- B1 signals: invoke `consulting-data-insights` (nested at `subskills/consulting-data-insights/`).
- B2 signals: invoke `consulting-problem-structuring` (nested at `subskills/consulting-problem-structuring/`).
- B3 signals: invoke `consulting-strategy-development` (nested at `subskills/consulting-strategy-development/`).
- Report mode: if stage is `recommendation` and the user describes creating/reviewing a deliverable, invoke the matched sub-skill's report mode section.

# Consulting Blueprint Creation
Before coaching begins:
1. Create `blueprint/` if missing.
2. Write or update `blueprint/Blueprint-YYYY-MM-DD.md`.
3. Add this header:

```md
# Consulting Blueprint
**Generated:** [date]
**Module:** [module name]
**Archetype:** [Diagnostic Tree / Linear Process / Heuristic - omit under tight deadline]
**Routing reason:** [1 sentence]
**Signal confidence:** [High / Medium / Low]
**Time pressure:** [tight deadline / moderate timeline / exploratory]
---
```

4. Then write the full 8-section skeleton and keep all sections present. Use these exact placeholders:

```md
## 1. Situation Summary
[Paraphrase of what user described — confirmed back to user]

## 2. Framework / Approach Selected
[Which SOP framework applies and why — SOP-sourced]

## 3. Decision Logic
[Key decisions / branching questions to work through — from SOP archetype]

## 4. Step-by-Step Playbook
[SOP steps — adaptive format by time pressure]

## 5. Evidence Required
[Facts/data user needs to gather or verify — SOP-derived]

## 6. Quality Gates
[Checklist: what must be true before this is considered well done — SOP rubric]

## 7. Missing Gaps
[What is unknown or unresolved — user must fill these in]

## 8. Next Action
[Single clearest next step]
``
Vollständige Quelle auf GitHub lesen (öffnet externe Seite)
Kontext

Verwandte Arbeit