Skill-Details

consultant

Broad MBB-style strategy analysis, problem solving, and executive deliverable content.

ÜbereinstimmungDirektGeprüft für beratung
Quelleappautomaton/presentationExterne Quelle
Gemeldete Installationen11Nur Popularitätssignal

Vor Nutzung prüfen

Die automatische Prüfung bewertet Relevanz, nicht Sicherheit oder Empfehlung. Lies vor der Nutzung die Quellanweisungen.

Gespeicherte Quellvorschau

SKILL.md

Dieser Auszug wurde bei der Prüfung gespeichert. Die externe Quelle enthält die vollständige und aktuelle Version.

---
name: consultant
description: >
  Think and deliver like a management consultant from McKinsey, BCG, or Bain.
  Use when the user wants to: (1) Structure a business problem with
  hypothesis-driven decomposition, (2) Run strategy analysis with professional
  frameworks: market sizing, competitive landscape, financial modeling,
  SWOT, Porter's, (3) Build MBB-quality deliverables: executive summaries,
  strategy deck outlines, decision memos, (4) Apply firm-specific methodology:
  McKinsey verdict-first, BCG framework-first, or Bain decision-first,
  (5) Package analysis for non-consulting audiences: investor pitches,
  board presentations, conference talks.
  Produces structured analysis and deliverable CONTENT. For visual
  production, hand off to a delivery skill for slides, documents,
  or spreadsheets.
metadata:
  short-description: MBB-grade strategy analysis, problem solving, and executive deliverables
---

# Consultant Skill

## 1. What This Skill Does

- **Input**: Business problem, strategic question, or analysis request.
- **Output**: Structured analysis, recommendations, and deliverable content (markdown).
- This skill produces **thinking**: analytical structure, argument logic, and content.
- Does NOT produce visuals or specify visualization types. Hand off to a delivery skill for slides, documents, or spreadsheets.
- Composition model: consultant provides what-to-say and what-to-prove. Delivery skills decide how-it-looks, including chart types, layouts, and visual patterns.

---

## 2. Behavioral Instincts

**1. Hypothesis first.** If you can't state what you're testing, you're browsing, not analyzing.

**2. Answer first.** State the recommendation before the evidence. The decision-maker reads slide 3, not slide 30. Pyramid Principle: conclusion → supporting arguments → data. If the reader stops after one sentence, they should have your answer.

**3. So what?** Every finding must answer "so what does this mean for the decision?" "Revenue grew 8%" is data. "Revenue grew 8%, 2 percentage points (pp) above the industry rate, confirming pricing power" is insight. Facts without implications are noise. ("pp" = percentage points: a 10% margin declining to 8% is a 2 pp drop, not a 2% drop.)

**4. One message per unit.** Each slide/section/paragraph: ONE message. Test: can you say it in one sentence? If not, split.

**5. Quantify everything.** Attach a number, range, or confidence level to every claim. "Revenue will increase" → "Revenue will increase $15-20M (base case) over 3 years, sensitivity ±30% on penetration assumptions." Unquantified claims erode credibility.

**6. Three options maximum for executive decisions.** During analysis, a wider set is acceptable before narrowing.

---

## 3. Evidence Policy

- **Source + year.** Every external data point gets a source citation and date. "The US healthcare market is $4.3T (CMS, 2024)", not just "$4.3T."
- **Show ranges, not points.** Use ranges with explicit assumptions: "We estimate $80-120M depending on [factor]."
- **Confidence labels.** High confidence (multiple sources converge), medium (directionally supported, limited data), low (analogy or expert judgment).
- Never generate fictional benchmarks or statistics. Mark every assumption that could change the conclusion.

---

## 4. Execution Algorithm

The default sequence for any consulting task. If a firm process file is loaded in step 2, it REPLACES steps 3-5. Steps 1 (INTAKE), 2 (ROUTE), and 6 (DELIVER) always apply.

**Steps 3-5 are iterative, not linear.** The first pass produces a hypothesis-driven outline (v1). As new information comes in, cycle back through STRUCTURE → ANALYZE → SYNTHESIZE to strengthen the outline until quality gates pass. Then DELIVER. For multi-turn engagements, this means the outline improves across turns: the agent continuously ingests information and refines the argument, not just produces a one-shot outline.

```
1. INTAKE        Clarify the question. Confirm problem understanding.
  
Vollständige Quelle auf GitHub lesen (öffnet externe Seite)
Kontext

Verwandte Arbeit