← Back to Research & Learning

Research a topic across the web with citations

Choose a general web-research workflow by source access, citation traceability, synthesis depth, and output destination.

Last meaningful review July 20, 2026

The job

You have a broad question or topic and need a multi-source research brief whose important claims link back to public web sources.

Includedgeneral multi-source web search · source comparison and claim attribution · cited research briefs

Not this pagesystematic academic literature review · market or competitor landscape analysis · private-data retrieval

30-second route

01

You have Firecrawl or Exa MCP available and need a comprehensive multi-source report.

It directly specifies multi-source search, full-source reading, inline citations, and claim-validation rules.

Editorial confidence: high
Consider Deep Research
02

You need a smaller evidence-backed answer or comparison and already have web access.

It provides direct citation, source-evaluation, conflict-handling, and concise synthesis guidance without a heavyweight process.

Editorial confidence: high
Consider Web Search
03

The research is broad and your host supports delegated tasks plus local research files.

It is purpose-built for planned parallel subresearch and cited synthesis from saved findings.

Editorial confidence: high
Consider Web Research
04

No web-search or declared research-tool access is available.

All selected workflows depend on web access or named external research tools.

Editorial confidence: high
Do not promise a cited web-research brief.

Before you install

Install Deep Research when its MCP prerequisites are available; adapt Web Search to an existing web-enabled host; use Web Research only where its delegated-task and file tools exist.

The supplied sources explicitly declare MCP requirements for Deep Research and tool-dependent workflows for Web Research, while Web Search declares guidance but no runtime setup.

Read the intervention guide →

Source-led comparison

What changes the choice

Facts are extracted from each selected Skill’s declared workflow. Signals describe public adoption; they are not a universal score.

Source notes

Inspect evidence and candidate limits 3 candidates

Why these candidatesEach candidate comes from tracked public sources and has a source-attributed adoption signal. This is a shortlist, not a catalogue or global ranking.

What this cannot establishWe read declared instructions and public signals. We do not run skills, benchmark outputs, audit security, or claim a universal best choice.

01

Deep Research

Source ↗

Use it forA thorough general web-research brief with inline source links and explicit quality checks.

Avoid ifFirecrawl or Exa MCP access is unavailable.

ActionInstall and configure at least one required MCP, then use its six-step research workflow.

EditsNone.

SetupRequires Firecrawl and/or Exa MCP; the source says both give best coverage and can be configured in ~/.codex/config.toml.

Inspect workflow and compatibility details

ContextBreak the topic into 3–5 sub-questions, search multiple sources, read key sources in full, and synthesize a cited report.

OutputResearch report with executive summary, themed findings with inline citations, takeaways, sources, and methodology.

ControlStructured end-to-end workflow with source-quality, corroboration, recency, gap, and fact-versus-inference rules.

InvocationNot yet mapped from the source.

Install scopeNot yet mapped from the source.

Agent fitGood for an agent that has the declared MCP tools and must produce a complete cited brief.

Watch outIts documented MCP tool names and result shapes are external dependencies; verify the configured tools before relying on live coverage.

Source-visible capabilitiesCited multi-source reportsSearches multiple web sources and specifies inline citations plus a Sources section in the report template.explicit sourceClaim validationRequires every claim to have a source and flags single-source claims as unverified.explicit source
CompatibilityCodexdeclarednot runtime-tested
Public signal59 /SkillsMP source-specificbest-overallcited-reportmulti-sourceexplicit source
02

Web Search

Source ↗

Use it forA lighter-weight, citation-first research workflow for clear web answers and concise comparisons.

Avoid ifYou need documented search-tool setup, delegated research, or a prescribed long-form report template.

ActionInstall and apply its research principles while using the host's available web-search capability.

EditsNone.

SetupNo runtime, command, or platform setup is declared in the supplied source.

Inspect workflow and compatibility details

ContextUse targeted and reformulated queries, assess sources, then organize findings by relevance.

OutputClear answer led by the direct answer, supporting context, and verified source URLs.

ControlPrinciple-based guidance: prefer primary sources, expose conflicts, distinguish fact from opinion, and curate 3–5 sources.

InvocationNot yet mapped from the source.

Install scopeNot yet mapped from the source.

Agent fitGood for agents that already have web access and need a compact evidence discipline rather than a heavy workflow.

Watch outThe supplied source describes research behavior but does not declare a search backend or installation prerequisites.

Source-visible capabilitiesURL citationsRequires sources to be cited with URLs so users can verify information.explicit sourceSource evaluation and synthesisPrefers primary sources, presents conflicting perspectives, and structures findings by relevance.explicit source
CompatibilityUnknownunknownnot runtime-tested
Public signal304 /SkillsMP source-specificcitation-firstlightweightgeneral-web-researchexplicit source
03

Web Research

Source ↗

Use it forA research brief that benefits from a saved plan, parallel subagents, local findings files, and final synthesis with source URLs.

Avoid ifThe host cannot provide the documented task, web_search, write_file, list_files, read_file, and fetch_url tools.

ActionInstall or adapt it only in a host with the documented tools; create a research folder and delegate non-overlapping subtopics.

EditsNone.

SetupRequires the tool surface named in the source, including task delegation, web search, local file operations, and URL fetching.

Inspect workflow and compatibility details

ContextPlan 2–5 subtopics, run up to three research subagents in parallel, review their saved findings, then synthesize the cited brief.

OutputA saved research plan, per-subtopic findings files, and optionally a final Markdown report with source URLs and noted gaps.

ControlFile-based, delegated workflow with bounded searches per subtopic and a mandatory synthesis pass.

InvocationNot yet mapped from the source.

Install scopeNot yet mapped from the source.

Agent fitGood for agents with subagent orchestration and shared local workspace tools.

Watch outThe workflow is tool-dependent and writes research artifacts; it is less suitable for a simple in-chat lookup.

Source-visible capabilitiesParallel multi-source researchDelegates distinct subtopics to up to three research subagents in parallel, each using web search.explicit sourceCited synthesisSynthesizes local findings into a response that cites specific sources with URLs and identifies gaps or limitations.explicit source
CompatibilityUnknownunknownnot runtime-tested
Public signal703 /SkillsMP source-specificdelegated-researchfile-based-workflowcited-reportexplicit source

Still comparing?

Tell us the job, not just the skill names.

Request a task guide
Did this decision map help?